Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise
Canada's Online Auto Magazine

Jil

Home
Classifieds
Contests
Auto News
New Vehicles
First Drives
Test Drives
Inside Story
Luxury Cars
Trucks
RVs
Buyer's Guide
Price Guide
Photos
Features
Bring it on!
50-Litre Challenge
Green Scene
More features
Winter Driving
Advice
Steering You Right
Product Reviews
Book Reviews
Calculators
Crossword
Used Car Reviews
Auto Shows
New York 2009
Vancouver 2009
Toronto 2009
Montreal 2009
Detroit 2009
Los Angeles 2008
Auto Tech
Classics
CarTalkCanada
Forums
Blogs
Web Directory
Search CanadianDriver
Browse the Archive
www.canadiandriver.com

March 6, 2009
Share |
Subscribe to RSS Feed

Test Drive: 2009 Honda Accord 4-cylinder EX-L Navi

2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder
2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder. Click image to enlarge

Related articles on CanadianDriver
Test-Drive: 2009 Honda Accord EX-L V6
First-Drive: 2008 Honda Accord
Test-Drive: 2008 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L V6
Test-Drive: 2008 Honda Accord EX Sedan
Test-Drive: 2008 Honda Accord EX-L
Test-Drive: 2008 Honda Accord EX-L V6

Manufacturer’s web site
Honda Canada

Join the official CanadianDriver Facebook group

Review and photos by Jil McIntosh

Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified Ads

Photo Gallery:
2009 Honda Accord

Oshawa, Ontario – People love gadgets. I’d gladly drive a car that had just a steering wheel, a windshield and a seat, but I’m not immune: within reason, I like bells and whistles. And I especially like that, thanks in part to fuel prices, manufacturers are starting to put these extras into models with smaller engines. This brings me to my tester, the 2009 Honda Accord sedan.

A 3.5-litre V6 is available, but my tester used a 2.4-litre four-cylinder, one of two versions offered on the Accord. Get the base LX model, and you get a 177-horsepower engine; on the EX, EX-L and my EX-L with Navigation models, power is rated at 190 horses. All four-cylinder models start with a five-speed manual, which can be upgraded to the five-speed automatic, like the one in my tester.

What I really like is the choice of trim lines: whereas some manufacturers might give you only lower-end amenities with the four-cylinder, Honda lets you go all the way to the top. My EX-L “Navi” (Honda walks up the trim ladder with its features, rather than offering them as stand-alone options) contained almost all of the goodies found in the EX-L V6, save for chrome door handles, garage door opener, fog lights, and a power passenger seat. And even better, I could have all of the EX-L Navi features and still have a manual transmission if I wanted.

2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder
2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder. Click image to enlarge

Of course, you can start with the LX, a four-cylinder-only trim that starts at $25,090. The four-banger moves up through the EX at $27,490, the EX-L for $29,890, and the EX-L with Navigation, at $31,890; an extra $1,200 puts the automatic transmission on each. Go for the V6, which comes only with the autobox, and you’ll run through the EX, EX-L and EX-L with Navigation for $31,690, $34,990 and $36,990, respectively. The hybrid version, never a big seller, was discontinued when the Accord was completely overhauled for the 2008 model year.

The redesign includes handsome exterior styling that makes the last-generation model look stodgy, with six-sided grille, head- and taillights that sweep back into the fenders, and 17-inch alloy wheels on all but the base LX, which uses 16-inch steelies with covers. About the only complaint is that the high trunk lid can restrict visibility for shorter drivers when backing up.

2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder
2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder
2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder. Click image to enlarge

I’ve never driven the 177-horsepower version, but my tester’s 190 ponies proved more than enough to pull the car around. There’s no rumble or whine on acceleration, and it’s quiet in all but the hardest punch on the highway. Even then it’s more than acceptable, especially since the fifth gear keeps it from droning at higher revs when it’s on the highway. The transmission also has a “shift-hold” built into it, and while my area lacks the winding roads to test it, Honda says that it reduces shifting when you move rapidly between brake and throttle on a succession of sharp curves. With the automatic transmission, the 2.4-litre is rated at 9.9 L/100 km in the city and 6.5 on the highway; in a week of bitterly cold weather, I averaged 11.0 L/100 km. The V6 model uses a variable cylinder management system that allows it to run either on three or four cylinders alone, depending on load, and has a rating of 11.0 and 6.7 in highway and city driving, respectively. The four-cylinder lacks the system, and uses all of its pistons all the time.

I also like that the transmission doesn’t have a manual shift mode, a gimmick to which I’ve never really warmed; if you want to shift, quit pretending and just buy a clutch. That said, some drivers may have a minor issue with the shift lever, which easily sails past “Drive” and stops more naturally at “D3”, a setting which prevents the transmission from shifting past third gear. I found myself checking each time to be sure I hadn’t pulled the lever too far.

The nicely-weighted steering is accurate, the car stays on-centre on the highway, and the wheel returns smoothly from sharp turns. The wheel is just the right size, too, and feels good in the hands. The previous-generation Accord’s ride was too firm for my liking – this is primarily a commuter car, not a sports sedan, after all – and this time around, it’s been softened up just enough that it’s comfortable without being wobbly. Only the nastiest pavement will send ripples into the cabin, and the car feels like a cohesive package, rather than a body set down over the suspension.

2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder
2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder. Click image to enlarge

The “L” in EX-L stands for Leather, and so my tester was fitted with cowhide. It’s not my favourite material for seats, but at least the heaters brought them up to a comfortable temperature in a hurry; the toasty-bun feature is standard with leather, but unavailable with cloth seats. But I did find that the chairs got hard after about an hour’s driving, and it seemed like the rear seats – which come with a goodly amount of legroom – were more cushiony and comfortable than the front ones.

I’m not entirely sold on the dash design. On one hand, the materials are all top-notch and fitted together well, and the “wood” trim is tastefully applied in just the right amount. On the other hand, the overpowering centre stack looks like it would be more at home in an Odyssey minivan. It’s easy to input destinations into the navigation system, but I didn’t fare as well with the voice command system. At one point, I logged only two correctly-followed commands out of ten. I thought it might have just been me, but my husband’s voice didn’t work much better. The instrument cluster is plain but easy to read, and all controls are backlit – even the mirror switch, which too many manufacturers leave in the dark.

2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder
2009 Honda Accord EX-L Navi four-cylinder. Click image to enlarge

The Accord’s folding rear seat falls forward only as a single unit, which means you can’t carry cargo on one side and a passenger on the other, as you could with a split-folding seat. Should your freight be long and narrow, such as a pair of skis, there’s a pass-through. But while many other automakers have gone to prop rods to hold up the deck lid, the Accord still uses gooseneck hinges, which protrude into the trunk and limit just how full you can pack it.

Even the LX comes with a full range of safety features, including anti-lock brakes with four discs, electronic brake distribution and brake assist, side and curtain airbags, active front head restraints, stability control and a tire pressure monitoring system; also included are air conditioning, power windows, keyless entry, cruise control, and an auxiliary jack on the stereo.

The EX adds a six-CD stereo, sunroof and power driver’s seat, while the EX-L upgrades the stereo wattage, and adds dual-zone automatic a/c, auto-dimming rearview mirror, Bluetooth, the leather seats and satellite radio, with the navigation system as an add-on to that.

All of that adds up to a nice package on a smaller engine, allowing buyers to load up on treats without having to opt for an extra two cylinders. Sure, a steering wheel and a seat will get you where you want to go, but being able to throw in the extras can make the drive all that much better.

Pricing: 2009 Honda Accord I4 EX-L with Navi
  • Base price: $31,890
  • Options: $2,695 (Automatic transmission $1,200; winter tires $1,495)
  • A/C tax: $100
  • Freight: $1,410
  • Price as tested: $36,095
    Click here for options, dealer invoice prices and factory incentives

    Specifications
  • Specifications: 2009 Honda Accord

    Competitors
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Chevrolet Malibu
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Chrysler Sebring
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Dodge Avenger
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Ford Fusion
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Hyundai Sonata
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Kia Magentis
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Mazda6
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Mitsubishi Galant
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Nissan Altima
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Saturn Aura
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Subaru Legacy
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Toyota Camry
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Volkswagen Jetta
  • View full article on one page
    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Jil McIntosh is a freelance writer, a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC) and Assistant Editor for CanadianDriver.com. Her personal website can be found at www.JilMcIntosh.com

    More Honda...
    More Test Drives...

    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Comments on this article -- 16

    GhiaFan says:

    Pretty positive article for a car that has some under whelming FE, shockingly high MSRP, and some not class leading features.

    $36,095 four-cylinder Accord,
    11.0 L/100 km,
    five-speed automatic,
    Accord still uses gooseneck hinges, which protrude into the trunk .
    The redesign includes handsome exterior styling.

    First time I have read or heard anyone use the word “handsome” when speaking about this new Accord.
    Looks are subjective yes, but this car is pretty generic looking and would say pretty much invisible.


    Let’s face it – the NRCAN fuel economy numbers are out to lunch and in no way reflect real Canadian conditions. EPA made the change to stricter fuel consumption reporting over a year ago.

    What is NRCAN waiting for?


    I’m a 06 TSX owner, in my opinion, the 09 TSX’s 31k price tag (though with less features than the previous models, hence a lot cheaper) is more attractive than the 4 banger Accord with navi. Then again some people might prefer Accord over TSX because of it drinks premium gas. I mean you can grab a navi for less than $300 these days.


    Mobius, an 09 TSX is actually closer to 33k ($32,900 according to acura.ca) and Acura would like you to pay $1725 for freight instead of Honda’s $1410. Still, I agree with you that the TSX is more attractive than a fully loaded 4cyl Accord. The TSX offers better handling, but the general public might prefer the larger size, and softer ride of the Accord.


    If you get an Accord, stick with the lower trims (LX, EX) in order to get good value for money. A TSX is much better value than an EX-L w/navi. Why spend 2 grand on the navigation, just get a good portable one for a fraction of the cost.

    My parents own a an EX 4-cyl and I have driven it many times. The steering is great, brakes are good (EX versions and up have bigger brakes), seats confortable and supportive and the drivetrain is best in class IMO. I have also driven the Malibu, Fusion, Camry and Altima 4 cyl versions.


    I agree with GhiaFan. 11 L/100km fuel economy is no better than our 05 V6 Malibu Maxx during the coldest spells of our Winnipeg winters.


    I realize this Accord was designed with the North American (read: US) market in mind, but I do wish it had tidier dimensions. I am old enough to remember when Accords used to be the size of the current Civics!

    Oh… and a quick comment about the brakes. Yes… they may be adequate but it’s shameful how the “bottom line” dictates the braking ability in this class of vehicle. Those of you who have had the fortune of driving a car with truly good brakes knows how many corners are cut in these cars. A sad reality.

    msantos says:

    There’s nothing wrong with the NRCAN fuel economy figures for this car and any other car.

    The perennial reason why few people fail to meet and exceed the federal fe ratings is that Canadians are very bad and inefficient drivers. Its as simple as that. Period!

    Everything they do, from exceeding the posted speed limits on a regular basis, to jack rabbit accelerations and rapid decelerations contributes to a lower observed fe.
    To make matters worse, many in the automotive media not only reflect this mediocrity in their tests but they even condone it by not even thinking about it.

    Truly a shame :(


    msantos -

    It’s great you meet all the NRCAN numbers fuel for every car you drive – BRAVO !!

    Now on to the real world….


    Actually, msantos has a point. Improving your own mileage by 10 per cent or so is easy if you’re willing to try.

    Matching NRCan fuel econ numbers, however, is nearly impossible; I’ve done it in a couple of cars, but it requires a driving style that really doesn’t mesh well with the normal flow of traffic, so it’s not a terribly good idea if you want to avoid getting the finger from every third driver.

    NRCan’s current rating system is a useful tool for comparing one car to another, but truth be told, they need to get their heads out of their arses and come up with a fuel econ testing procedure that is more realistic.


    I have a 2008 accord V6 Ex-L. I hate the driver leather seat, its too hard for long drives and the car feel too big (it lost the sporty feel my older accord had). Also, it has been back to the dealer for oil consumption problem (bad intake valve seals). Also, I read that many new accords have issues with the rear brakes wearing prematurly. I don’t recommend the new accord for anyone.

    William says:

    I have to agree with GhiaFan. Even an automatic LX Accord’s MSRP with $1410 will top out at $28,000 before taxes. The Honda Accord no longer represent good value.


    Tortuous, incessant, squealing/howling wind noise from mid-windshield base, center dash and driver side door at speeds over 80km make the 2009 Accord EX-L my biggest, most expensive regret and the dealer says it cannot be fixed as it is a “common characteristic” …ever had a root canal? Time for a class-action lawsuit on this issue. BBB and the media will be hearing from me. Be forewarned everyone.

    Steevo says:

    We just acquired a new Honda Accord EX-L — our first experience with a Japanese vehicle after umpteen North America cars. My initial impression is very favourable — consistent with the review(s). The reason the Japanese are winning the battle against the domestics can be summed up in the Accord we own — cudos for the myriad of safety features, impressive build quality, surprising fuel efficiency, superior resale value and outstanding attention to detail. After three weeks behind the wheel my wife has a new love in her life — the new Accord!


    I just recently acquired my 4th new Honda Accord EXL 4 cyl. sedan. We are more than pleased with the new 2009 model. Has a smooth comfortable ride, good engine power, comfortable seats, all around vision is excellent. Recommend this vehicle highly.

    ken jr. says:

    I just own a 2008 accord ex-l 4cylinder.
    Had it for just over a 1yr and I have no single
    mechanical problem with her.
    and I don’t really think that 09 acura tsx has a better looks than a new accord. I don’t like tsx use
    too much shiny silver metal on the front grill.
    I believe that these two cars are made by different purposes. tsx handle better,interior
    looks more expensive(because of acura is upper division from honda; they had to make it more expensive anyway.)
    accord offers more comfortable riding (still feel didn’t lose much of honda spirit) and more interior room (new accord now consider as a big size sedan)
    it’s simply like
    tsx- for you and your girl friend
    accord- for you and your family. period.
    @EDK- why did u choose new accord if it’s too big for you ??? didn’t u check the spec or test drive before you buy?? that’s a nonsense that you complaining about the size of your car after u buy year later..
    also it’s a very comfortable car no matter how long I drive.If the seat is too stiff for you, get a american made car that give u fuzzy feeling cushioned seat.

    Untitled
    Quick Links
    Research: Buyer's Guide, Price Guide, First Drives, Test Drives, Luxury Cars, Trucks, Used Vehicles
    Photos: Galleries - Ten thousand BIG photos
    Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS: Daily updates
    Untitled
    © 1999-2009, CanadianDriver Communications Inc., all rights reserved
    Disclaimer | Privacy | Advertise