Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise
Canada's Online Auto Magazine

Jil

Home
Classifieds
Contests
Auto News
New Vehicles
First Drives
Test Drives
Inside Story
Luxury Cars
Trucks
RVs
Buyer's Guide
Price Guide
Photos
Features
Bring it on!
50-Litre Challenge
Green Scene
More features
Winter Driving
Advice
Steering You Right
Product Reviews
Book Reviews
Calculators
Crossword
Used Car Reviews
Auto Shows
New York 2009
Vancouver 2009
Toronto 2009
Montreal 2009
Detroit 2009
Los Angeles 2008
Auto Tech
Classics
CarTalkCanada
Forums
Blogs
Web Directory
Search CanadianDriver
Browse the Archive
www.canadiandriver.com

May 15, 2009
Share |
Subscribe to RSS Feed

Test Drive: 2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW

2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW. Click image to enlarge

Related articles on CanadianDriver
Test Drive: 2009 Mini John Cooper Works
Test Drive: 2009 Mini John Cooper Works
First Drive: 2008 Mini Clubman
First Drive: 2008 Mini Clubman
Test Drive: 2008 Mini S Clubman
Test Drive: 2008 Mini Cooper

Manufacturer’s web site
Mini Canada

Join CanadianDriver’s Facebook group
Follow CanadianDriver on Twitter

Review and photos by Jil McIntosh

Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified Ads

Photo Gallery:
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman

Oshawa, Ontario – I remember being at the Toronto Auto Show when BMW brought out the all-new model that would once again wear the venerable Mini name. The introductory press days are a great opportunity to see the behaviour of Automobilius Journalati in its natural habitat: the species often feigns disinterest, lest it be mistaken for a “newbie,” or someone who hasn’t already scoped out the auto in detail on spy-photo websites. But when the presentation was finished, there was a cavalry charge to the stage, with everyone fighting for a chance to sit in the little coupe.

I was one of them, and I’ve never lost my taste for this little gadabout. And for my first time out with a Clubman model, the BMW/Mini folks provided me with a John Cooper Works (JCW) model, which ups the ante on the turbocharged Mini S to 208 horsepower and 192 lb-ft of torque, compared to the regular S’s 172 horses and 177 lb-ft.

It also increases the price, and this is where Mini loses those who think cars should be priced by weight and volume. They aren’t inexpensive cars in any form, with the naturally-aspirated Clubman starting at $26,400. The turbocharged Clubman S starts at $31,500, but the JCW Clubman begins its ascent at $39,990. My tester was further optioned to a total of $45,530 – far more than I would have paid for it, as much as I liked driving it, but that’s what makes this a relatively exclusive brand.

A new model introduced for 2008, the Clubman is meant to be reminiscent of the Mini Traveller, Countryman and Clubman Estate models of the 1960s. Its wheelbase and overall length are longer than the Mini Cooper; it’s also taller, but not wider. It has a single door on the driver’s side, while on the passenger side, a small secondary door provides easier (but not necessarily easy) access to the second-row seats.
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW. Click image to enlarge

It has no exterior handle, and can only be opened if the passenger’s front door is open and the seatbelt is not in use. In the back, the Mini Cooper’s one-piece, top-hinged hatch is replaced with two small “barn doors,” which swing out independently. The taillights remain attached to the body, with the doors cut out and sealed around them. Inside, the instrument panel and controls are shared with the Cooper models.

All Mini models use a 1.6-litre four-cylinder engine that’s turbocharged on the S and JCW variants. A six-speed automatic that can be added to all others is verboten on the JCW, which strictly comes with a six-speed manual. Put your foot into the accelerator and hang on tight, because even with the Clubman’s extra weight (80 kg over the Cooper S), the turbocharged powerplant gets you where you’re going in a hurry. It’s officially rated at 6.8 seconds to get to 100 km/h, a mere 0.3 seconds more than a Cooper S with the JCW package.

Those hot exhaust gases swirl out through twin pipes that sit on either side of the car, rather than the mid-mounted pair that perch below the license plate on the regular Cooper S. There’s a lovely growl to the exhaust note, especially when it’s driven hard, but at lower speeds in city traffic, quick hops off the throttle tended to result in a popping sound out the back. A BMW rep told me that enthusiasts enjoy this visceral “crack,” but I just found it annoying; from inside, it sounded like the car was passing gas, and not the petroleum type.

Speaking of gas, the Mini asks for the premium variety. Against a published rating of 7.9 L/100 km in the city and 5.8 on the highway, I averaged 8.8 L/100 km (32 mpg), which was far better than I expected to achieve, given that I didn’t give the car an easy time during my week with it.

2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW. Click image to enlarge

The console includes a “Sport” button, which quickens the accelerator response and gives an even more direct response to steering input. It deactivates when the ignition is turned off and must be switched back on each time, which I ended up doing almost every time I started it, because it really is fun, without being twitchy. All that power to this front-driver makes for some pretty impressive torque steer, though, and you very quickly learn to hang onto the wheel. If you’ve driven the Cooper model, you’ll probably find that it’s a little better balanced through the twisties than the longer and heavier Clubman, but that’s relative. I think only hard-core enthusiasts who regularly show up at the track will find reason to fault the Clubman for it; everyday drivers who just like some spirit in their steeds should be impressed by its agility, and the longer wheelbase also makes for a ride that’s slightly more pliant on rough roads.

One of the problems with the Mini’s devotion to its looks – and it can be a problem with any slavishly retro styling – is that form doesn’t always translate into function. It starts with the exterior door handles, which look great, but which require you to put your hand inside them, and then squeeze the inner workings against the outer shell. My fingers aren’t very strong, and I often had trouble opening them, especially when my hands were cold. Should the weather turn sour, or you live in a province that uses road salt, there’s no way to avoid getting your hand or your glove dirty.

I’ve also never twigged to the Mini’s centre stack, which is beautifully styled, and about as intuitive as a Greek road map to a Russian driver. The huge centre-mounted pod, in homage to the original Mini, contains the speedometer; I always end up using the digital readout in the tachometer, which is the gauge directly in front of the driver. The stereo is a three-step process: audio buttons and tuner knob up top, CD player in the centre, and the power and volume knob at the bottom. Climate mode buttons mimic the shape of the Mini’s winged logo, but the fan speed and heater dials on either side must be tapped up or down, rather than spun. A row of identical toggles below, separated by little metal gates, handle power windows, fog lamps and power locks. It isn’t easy to do anything without taking your eyes off the road.

“Comfort Access” can be added for $490, which gives you a proximity key with pushbutton start. Mine wasn’t so equipped, and so I had to insert the saucer-shaped key and then press a starter button. My car did have numerous features added to its list, though, including “Lounge Leather” to replace the standard faux cowhide, heated seats, automatic climate control, rain-sensing wipers (I didn’t get any rain, but Mini’s auto wipers have failed my “work in all conditions” test before), and a sunroof. It’s actually two large sunroof panels, including one over the rear seats, and while only the front one slides open, both of them pop up. That’s very unusual, as usually the rear panel on these double-glass affairs is fixed in place. When the front pane slides open, a deflector pops up, and it works very well, so that you just get ventilation instead of a windstorm. The sliding cover for both panels is an open-weave affair that lets in lots of sunshine. I appreciated that during the cooler weather I experienced, but I don’t know if drivers would prefer a thicker material to keep out the rays on a hot summer day.

2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW
2009 Mini Cooper Clubman JCW. Click image to enlarge

As always, the front seats are very well done, with supportive design and good bolstering. A five-foot-eleven friend offered to assess the rear seat, and so I opened the front door and then unlatched the smaller door in behind. He still needed to fold up somewhat to get in, but once he was there, he reported sufficient legroom, and a comfortable chair. If he’d wanted a coffee, he could have parked it in the cupholder molded into the armrest.

Lacking a central pillar, these secondary doors can sometimes feel wobbly, but once the Mini’s was closed, it was as solid as a regular door. It’s also well integrated and doesn’t make the car look clunky.

The rear barn doors are more of a novelty; they look great, but I find the Cooper’s one-piece hatch more practical, especially since the central pillar in back cuts down on rearward visibility. Hitting the key fob unlocks the right-hand door and pops it open slightly; you then manually open the left one. With the rear seat up, the cargo floor is 50 cm long, while folding the rear seat opens it to 130 cm of length. (The last Mini Cooper I drove measured 37 and 100 cm, respectively.) My car came with an optional $450 Travel Package, which added a flat-loading floor: the floor cover holds up to 75 kg (165 lb), according to the owner’s manual, while valuables can be neatly tucked out of sight under it. The option package also includes a folding storage bin that would make it a cinch to carry home grocery bags without your canned spaghetti rolling around in back.

As with all Mini models, the Clubman is more about what it is, than what it isn’t. You can bring home some of your IKEA shopping with it, but it’s not primarily a cargo hauler. You can put two friends in the back, but it’s not really for carpooling. It’s great fun to drive, but it’s not a rear-wheel BMW 1 Series. And its hefty price limits its popularity in the mass market. It takes a certain type of customer to want a Mini, but that’s what a niche car is all about. If you don’t get it, it’s not the car for you. And if you do, then slot in that key and have yourself some fun.

Pricing: 2009 Mini Clubman JCW
  • Base price: $39,990
  • Options: $5,540 (JCW Comfort Package of rain sensor, automatic headlamps, automatic climate control, sunroof and heated seats, $1,900; Travel Package of luggage compartment package and flat-loading floor, $450; Lounge leather, $1,500; Park Distance Control, $450; Hi-Fi Sounds system, $750; and Media Connects of Bluetooth and USB audio integration, $490)

  • A/C tax: $100
  • Freight: $1,350
  • Price as tested: $46,980
    Click here for options, dealer invoice prices and factory incentives

    Specifications
  • Specifications: 2009 Mini Cooper

    Competitors
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Audi A3
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 BMW 1 Series
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Dodge SRT4
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 MazdaSpeed3
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Volvo C30
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Volkswagen GTI

    Crash test results
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
  • View full article on one page
    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Jil McIntosh is a freelance writer, a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC) and Assistant Editor for CanadianDriver.com. Her personal website can be found at www.JilMcIntosh.com

    More Mini...
    More Test Drives...

    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Comments on this article -- 13


    I’m sure it performs well, but man that thing is ugly!


    WOW,I agree with Sean, I can’t believe BMW would design somehing like this. $40,000 LOL


    The classic and iconic 2 dr hatchback Mini Cooper is the way to go aesthetically and I believe for its purpose functionally. I currently own a 2008 R56s coupe; with the rear seats folded down and a roof rack on top it makes the perfect weekend getaway car for two people and a dog. Amazing gas mileage compared to competitors like the VW GTI, and great fun to drive. Regarding the interior design, within a moment of using the various controls it becomes second nature and a good compromise between function and aesthetics again compared to the dreary, bland interiors of every other manufacturer. Niche vehicle indeed, anything to avoid driving the various other appliances on the road.


    The back is very ugly indeed. The concept of a slightly bigger mini is good though. If I were to get one, I would immediately get the rear all painted the same as the body colour. I think that would improve it significantly.

    However, 45 grand for a mini? No way, pass! At least on the JCW version.


    Although it handles well, $45k for a car that has the same basic engine as a Peugeot 207 is too much. Mini/BMW can do all they want with the engine, it’s still the same 1.6 found in a car half the price. In the same price range, you can get so many other cars that either offer better performances (like the BMW 135i) or have better looks (although this is more a question of personal taste). I like the looks, but design wise it is nothing more then a nostalgic hatch in my opinion. It is sad to hear you need a roof rack for a week-end gateway… ;)

    Mike P. says:

    If everyone made a “logical” choice, we’d all be driving Toyota Corollas or Camrys.

    While there are more logical and rational choices in this segment, evidently, enough people like the MINI’s combination of style, zip, luxury, and “practicality” (it’s got a back seat and a hatch, which is better than some cars it might be cross-shopped with) that BMW keeps developing the line. Enough said.


    45k + 14% Tax.

    Can’t see it.

    The logical choice would be not to buy it, no matter what automotive niche it may fit.

    Mike P. says:

    Well, that’s the JCW. Which is like… a niche within a niche.

    You can get 100% of the “MINI” experience from a $25K Cooper. Which is still pricey, but clearly BMW is doing with them priced at that point.

    ECON 100–the price is what people are willing to pay.


    Although the Mini has been somewhat of a success story, a lot of people are buying it for the brand name as engineering wise there’s nothing new or special about it. The heart of a car is the engine, and the Mini has nothing to show for under the hood. The marketing people at BMW definitely got it right though and deserves an award for it.
    I don’t like Toyota’s and don’t think it’s a logical buy for some. However I understand why people would buy them. For the Mini in my opinion it is a simple fashion statement with a price premium that hits a particular market. But the JCW Clubman is somewhat of a contradiction.

    Marketing 201 – Perceived value


    @Roger: I dunno about the new Minis having nothing to show for under the hood. A turbocharged 1.6-litre that goes like heck and can still average under 7 L/100 km on the highway is a pretty nice combination to me.

    What would Mini have to do to make you feel their cars are a stronger value?


    It’s still a very small 1.6 engine co-produced and developped with Peugeot, and sold by Peugeot in the exact form in some of their very econobox cars competing with cars like the Ford Focus ( Peugeot 207 and 308). What is so amazing about that engine? A Yaris at more then $10k less has a basic engine with almost the same specs (vs base Mini). The latest Kia Soul 1.6 engine is also capable of 120hp. The only difference is the turbo in the Mini S and JCW. A turbocharger does not cost $20k and I doubt the rest of the car can justify the premium. All I’m saying is that the Mini has no new technology. What it has under the hood can be found on any car on the market. The Mazdaspeed3 costing much less offers better or equal performance… The old Toyota 4EFTE engine from the 90’s was 1.3 liter and was making 140 hp costing half the price. So what has Mini done in 10 years of development? The JCW is nothing more then more boost for the turbo which is the easiest way to get hp.

    The new Ford Fiesta 2010 with a 1.6 engine will have an optional turbo kit (per the Ford USA website) and I doubt Ford will price the Fiesta at $30k.

    Mike P. says:

    Er… sit in a Yaris or a Soul, then sit in a MINI. There is no comparison in terms of interior finish. The MINI feels like a premium product. It feels as solid as any other BMW.

    And while the Yaris may match the base Cooper’s on-paper specifications, it is nowhere near as fun to drive as the MINI. The MINI is miles ahead. The engine, while sourced from PSA, is BMW tuned (an engine can feel very different depending on how it is tuned) and, in the MINI, has much less weight to pull than, say, a Peugeot 207. Then there’s the chassis and handling of the MINI. Drive both and tell me the MINI isn’t significantly better than the Yaris, despite what their spec sheets show.

    With your logic, a Lotus Elise shouldn’t be worth any more than a Toyota Celica (GT-S).

    The two aren’t in the same market. MINI isn’t targeting value buyers of economy cars. It’s a car for people who are looking for a fuel-efficient small car that doesn’t feel cheap and is… fun.

    The Mazdaspeed3 is indeed excellent value and a great car. But you’d be hard pressed to get 7.5L/100km out of it, which is the beauty of the MINI. You can have fun without feeling guilty or feeling the pinch at the pump.


    All I can say is that since I bought my mini clubman its brought an enormous number of comments and requests to have a go with it – it’s been on permanent loan to my friends who all want it for the day fof their birthdays and love it. It is fu to drive it is beautifully engineered and copes well in snow ridden Canada. It’s easy on gas even if it does the premium variety. It was different and fun and feels solid and goes faster than I notice.

    Untitled
    Quick Links
    Research: Buyer's Guide, Price Guide, First Drives, Test Drives, Luxury Cars, Trucks, Used Vehicles
    Photos: Galleries - Ten thousand BIG photos
    Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS: Daily updates
    Untitled
    © 1999-2009, CanadianDriver Communications Inc., all rights reserved
    Disclaimer | Privacy | Advertise