Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise
Canada's Online Auto Magazine

Jil

Home
Classifieds
Contests
Auto News
New Vehicles
First Drives
Test Drives
Inside Story
Luxury Cars
Trucks
RVs
Buyer's Guide
Price Guide
Photos
Features
Bring it on!
50-Litre Challenge
Green Scene
More features
Winter Driving
Advice
Steering You Right
Product Reviews
Book Reviews
Calculators
Crossword
Used Car Reviews
Auto Shows
New York 2009
Vancouver 2009
Toronto 2009
Montreal 2009
Detroit 2009
Los Angeles 2008
Auto Tech
Classics
CarTalkCanada
Forums
Blogs
Web Directory
Search CanadianDriver
Browse the Archive
www.canadiandriver.com

August 4, 2009
Share |
Subscribe to RSS Feed

Test Drive: 2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S

2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S. Click image to enlarge

Related articles on CanadianDriver
First Drive: 2009 Nissan Cube

Manufacturer’s web site
Nissan Canada

Join CanadianDriver’s Facebook group
Follow CanadianDriver on Twitter

Review and photos by Jil McIntosh

Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified Ads

Photo Gallery:
2009 Nissan Cube

Oshawa, Ontario – I just love little Japanese tchotchkes. As a result of numerous trips to Asian stores in Toronto, my office is scattered with all manner of rubber sushi rolls, anime characters, plastic creatures and, of course, way too much Hello Kitty. Needless to say, the Nissan Cube was a perfect fit.

This odd-looking five-seater is new to Canada for 2009, but our model is actually the third generation of a nameplate that first appeared in Japan in 1998. Its styling comes over virtually unchanged which, depending on personal taste, will either have you flocking to it, or using the same word in front of “ugly” that my neighbour did when she saw it, and which I can’t print here.

The Cube is based on the Nissan Versa hatchback, and uses that model’s 1.8-litre four-cylinder engine. With a starting price of $16,998 for my S tester, it’s considerably more than the Versa hatchback, which starts at $13,998. But the Cube comes much better equipped: standard equipment includes air conditioning, power locks with keyless entry, and power windows, which are extra-charge on the Versa, along with cruise control and an auxiliary jack for the stereo, which are unavailable on the base Versa hatchback.

2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S. Click image to enlarge

Both the Versa and Cube have six airbags and active front head restraints, but anti-lock brakes are standard on the Cube, and optional on the base Versa hatchback. Nissan also puts electronic stability control on both trim lines of the Cube (the upper-line SL is $20,698), but it’s unavailable on any Versa.

My Cube came with the default transmission, a six-speed manual, which is rare in a segment that’s more commonly equipped with five-speeds. The automatic transmission choice is a CVT, which is a $1,300 option on the base S, and the only unit available on the SL. I haven’t driven it in the Cube, but I have in the Versa, and I wasn’t keen on it. Nissan’s CVTs work exceptionally well in its larger vehicles, but when mated to this smaller engine, I found it sluggish, with a tendency for everything to drone at lower r.p.m.s. I really like the Cube’s six-speed, though: it’s well set up for commuter driving, with a light clutch, slick shifter and easy operation. The trade-off is fuel economy: while the six-speed is rated at 8.3 L/100 km in the city and 6.6 on the highway, the CVT’s published rate is 7.3 L/100 km in the city and 6.5 on the highway. In combined driving, I averaged 7.7 L/100 km (37 mpg Imp).

Designed for crowded Tokyo streets, the Cube is no powerhouse. Its little engine is buzzy and takes its time to get up to speed. The stick shift comes in handy, letting the driver make the most of the engine’s 122 horses and 127 lb-ft of torque. If there’s anything to really fault with the Cube in the city, it’s the ratio of fuel to power. I don’t mind gentle performance if there’s a trade-off at the pumps, but some of its manual-equipped small-footprint competitors feel much livelier for less: in city driving, the five-speed Chevrolet Aveo rates at 7.9 L/100 km, the Honda Civic and Hyundai Accent rate at 7.4, Mini gets 7.1, and Corolla rates 7.5.

2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S. Click image to enlarge

The ride is surprisingly supple, and bumps are soaked up much better than you’d expect for the segment. There’s no steering feel, but it’s perfect for crowded city streets, where its light touch lets you easily spin it around corners and into tight spots. Take it on the highway on a windy day, though, and no surprise: it turns into a sail.

Its tall windows provide excellent visibility all around. Oddly, though, while the window surrounds are rounded on the outside, they’re square on the inside. This means that passengers get a view of the overlapping sheet metal and window seals, which look unfinished. The most notable styling cue is the asymmetrical “wraparound” rear window – which, in Japan’s right-hand drive market, wraps on the left side. From the outside, it would seem that the driver gets an unfettered view around the Cube’s right rear corner; in actuality, there’s a support post behind the glass, so the view is the same on both sides. The rear door is hinged on the left, for North American curbside loading, although you’re in a bind if someone parks right on your rear bumper.

The Cube is shorter than the Versa, but of course it’s taller, and that slab-sided styling really makes the most out of the space its footprint covers. When Nissan brought it out at the Toronto Auto Show, it contained five Toronto Argonauts football players, who generally aren’t known to wear size-zero uniforms. About the only car out there with more front headroom is a convertible with the roof stowed.

2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S. Click image to enlarge

As with the Versa, the seats are stuffed generously with foam, and are exceptionally nice; between the gentle ride and the tush-friendly chairs, the Cube is an extremely comfortable vehicle for a long drive. Depending on whether you’re carrying companions or cargo, the rear seat can be slid ahead or back, lengthening the rear load area from a length of 57 cm to 72 cm. The cargo area is recessed for even more vertical packing, but it makes for a very high lift-over when filling it. The rear seatbacks fold, but the seats themselves don’t flip forward, and so while cargo space increases to a length of 135 cm, you’re stuck with a riser that’s 32 cm tall in the middle of it. That said, Nissan does sell an accessory cargo organizer that fits into the space, with bins that close to form a flat floor when the seats are folded, for an extra $326.

The rest of the add-on accessory list bounces between fun and functional, although they can be jaw-droppingly expensive: neon-coloured small-item hooks to replace the standard black ones ($35.95), a utility pouch that hangs from them ($58.95), bungee cords that fit into crescent-shaped holders on the door ($33.06), LED interior lighting ($498.95), and a round dash topper made of shag carpeting ($58.95). My tester also had a combination cargo cover and net, but it’s an odd thing that mostly just gets in the way.

2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S. Click image to enlarge

The dash is all proudly plastic, a two-tone affair that curves out to meet the centre stack. Twin instrument gauges are housed in a wide oval that echoes the upright ovals of the vents. The SL’s standard automatic climate control is a large circle of buttons, but my S tester’s manual system involved three easy-to-use dials. Storage space is more than adequate: three cupholders in the low-slung centre console and two more on the driver’s side of the dash (one small enough to hold the requisite can of Red Bull), along with bottle-friendly door pockets and a storage bin on the driver’s side C-pillar. A circular motif is carried throughout the cabin, most notably on the moulded headliner, as well as in the speakers, cupholders, and on an outside window panel: you certainly can put a round hole into a square peg.

As often happens with our smaller market, Canada gets less of a selection than the U.S. There, buyers can also get a top-end Kröm trim model, which also includes a body skirt package, Bluetooth connectivity, 20-colour accent lighting, black and grey cloth seats, aluminum pedals, leather-wrapped wheel, and upgraded speaker system.

When it comes to shopping around, buyers naturally have the usual subcompact options, but really, given the Cube’s polarizing appearance, anyone considering it is really looking at the battle of the boxes. That means the Kia Soul, since Toyota isn’t bringing its entry-level Scion brand, and presumably the slab-sided xB hatchback, to our country until 2010.

2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S. Click image to enlarge

The Soul costs more than the Cube, and price is a major factor in this segment, but the Korean rival also offers a lot in its mid-range trim. The base 1.6-litre Soul has the same horsepower as the Cube but less torque; it’s cheaper at $15,495, but air conditioning is an extra $1,000, and anti-lock brakes and stability control are missing. Move up a trim level, though, and Soul gets a 142-horsepower 2.0-litre engine, along with air conditioning, ABS and ESC. It’s $997 more than a base Cube, but the Soul’s warranty is also better: five years or 100,000 km on everything, versus three years/60,000 km bumper-to-bumper on the Cube, and then 5/100,000 on the powertrain only.

Despite its box-on-box styling, the Soul still isn’t as out-there as the Cube, and I think that will be what will make or break this car with buyers: those who dislike it won’t be wooed by its practicality, while those who love its offbeat charm will simply consider its functionality as a bonus. As for me (and I’m smitten), I want a miniature one to go with the rest of the cool stuff on my shelf: Hello Kitty needs something to drive.

Pricing: 2009 Nissan Cube 1.8 S
  • Base price: $16,998
  • Options: $135 (Metallic/pearl paint)
  • A/C tax: $100
  • Freight: $1,325
  • Price as tested: $18,558
    Click here for options, dealer invoice prices and factory incentives

    Competitors
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2010 Chevrolet HHR
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Chrysler PT Cruiser
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Dodge Caliber
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Honda Fit
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Jeep Compass
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2010 Kia Soul
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Nissan Versa
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Pontiac Vibe
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2010 Toyota Matrix

    Crash test results
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
  • View full article on one page
    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Jil McIntosh is a freelance writer, a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC) and Assistant Editor for CanadianDriver.com. Her personal website can be found at www.JilMcIntosh.com

    More Nissan...
    More Test Drives...

    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Comments on this article -- 22


    Must….look…..away…..must……not…..hurl…..


    You have quoted the hwy fuel economy numbers for the Soul at the end of the article where you meant to quote city fuel economy. In reality the Soul with the larger engine is rated at 8.6 l/km in the city versus the Cube at 7.3.


    Tēnā koe Jill,

    Another comprehensive review.

    I did have to look up the word tchotchkes.

    I thought that you might be using a Japanese word but imagine my surprise to find you were using an incorrect variation of a Yiddish word derived from obsolete Polish ! The correct word is tchptchke. Sources, Merriam Webster and Your dictionary .com. its not even in the Oxford or Canadian Oxford.

    Haere rā

    Peter


    Interesting vehicle.

    Micheal says:

    The seats would be fairly comfortable for my 6′2″ body if they had a lumbar support. How can anyone design a modern car without a lumbar support…and a telescopic steering wheel? Otherwise I like the car.

    New Age group says:

    buy a honda fit, cost the same and is more reliable, more efficient,as roomy and higher resale value.


    New age;

    Cost the same, maybe. The cube is too new for your conclusion.

    Better yet, get a Chevy Cobalt, much cooler.

    Forester Man (Subaru4Life) says:

    Nice! Kinda like a portable toilet on wheels… or maybe sort of a golf cart for the highway…

    I sincerely think that this is a great vehicle – as useful as a smart car! Really its a fashion statement for those who crave utility, style and economy.

    Style is a very subjective thing these days. But hey its a Nissan – it will last long and have decent resale value for the off beat and quirky people that will drive them.

    Ok, who let the chief LEGGO designer into the Nissan design studios…

    Hey is George Baris now working for Nissan?

    European driver says:

    Todays form of tchotchke/tchptchke in Polish is “cacko” (read: tzatzko). It means: 1. tiny item with artistic value or precisly made 2. something cute.
    Sorry for off topic.

    It looks like a toy, cute toy, but it’s not for me.

    Memphis says:

    @New Age Group,

    I’ve never understood why people buy a car with resale in mind. Then again I keep my cars 10years.. so they’re worth next to nothing anyway.

    As for reliability, if thats your concern. Buy an appliance (Honda/Toyota). For the rest, if you take care of it, it will take care of you.


    Anyone ever watch Post man Pat? hahah its the same as his postal van…
    I don’t like the look of it…nothing could make me be seen in a Cube or a Smart car….or a beatle for that matter

    old guys rule says:

    It seems the cube is targeted for young women, who knows, but Nissan may be on to something here.

    toronto says:

    Exterior IMO is let’s call it cool, asian young generation, love it or hate it but the dash board, oh my god, I saw it and it looks like it was made from a plastic toys from dollarama. Absolutely 80’s no taste low quality I don’t care how my dash board looks like.
    Flimsy doors, seats, tiny engine, ridiculous.
    I am in hate it category.

    toronto says:

    Memphis, you are absolutely right. I go ballistic on people telling me to buy a honda or toyota for a better resale value. Are you out of your mind? Car is not investment, it’s for your own pleasure driving whatever the type and model and color is. not to make money on it.
    I would dread every single minute in a toyota or honda just to have RESALE value at the end. I drove a camry as a rental and I think my life got shorter in it. Sorry, toyota and honda fans but there are people out there who thing paying close to 30k for a civic is an absolute ripoff for what you get.

    Don’t go crazy on me, JMHO


    Toronto,

    What is your idea of a better car family car?


    Count me as one who loves it. Funky looks are great in a 2CV sort of way.


    I agree with your neighbor, it’s fugly.

    toronto says:

    Jim,

    How about chrysler 300?
    roomy, used is dirt cheap, half a mercedes car.
    Comes loaded with gps, dvd, all the bells and whistles.

    Any thoughts? Just don’t start with american crap as the american cars have improved in quality a lot in the last years and they are the best value for the money.

    I prefer European cars (mercedes) but in north america the best deal for the money is an american car.

    Consumer Advocate says:

    Although there had been improvements on initial quality for the Detroit three automakers. It is the long term ownership where the Japanese nameplates shine. The Japanese nameplates age better than Detroit’s.

    The 300’s low roof hampers driver’s visibility, the ride is stiff and busy on freeways. There are better choices.


    The Jap nameplates really shine in building this POS; unfortunantely if you buy one it will last long! It’s not Kinda like a portable toilet on wheels…it is a portable toilet (and you’ll have it for a long time…lol).

    Really its a fashion statement for those who crave ignorance and to be laughed at. Style is a very subjective thing these days, so Nissan decided to build a box…lol. Look designer a ball, maybe you can build a round car, call it the bubble a great vehicle for those who crave rolling.

    The moron above here is “hampered by the 300’s low roof”…lol. This car hampers my manhood…GET A LIFE!

    ken jr. says:

    which one is better kia soul or nissan cube??


    Whomever thought that anyone could ever build an uglier car than the GM Aztec, was just proven wrong. Way to go Nissan…..

    Untitled
    Quick Links
    Research: Buyer's Guide, Price Guide, First Drives, Test Drives, Luxury Cars, Trucks, Used Vehicles
    Photos: Galleries - Ten thousand BIG photos
    Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS: Daily updates
    Untitled
    © 1999-2009, CanadianDriver Communications Inc., all rights reserved
    Disclaimer | Privacy | Advertise