2009 Nissan 370Z Touring. Click image to enlarge |
|
Related articles on CanadianDriver
Manufacturer’s web site
|
Review and photos by Jil McIntosh
Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified Ads
Photo Gallery:
2009 Nissan 370Z
Oshawa, Ontario – When I announced that I was going to be test-driving the all-new 2009 Nissan 370Z, a set of ears pricked up: those of a good friend who owns a copy of the last-generation model, a 2007 350Z. So when I tell you that this newest incarnation of Nissan’s iconic two-seater is an improvement on a vehicle that was already a pretty nice ride, it’s not just me talking, but someone who lives with the 350Z on a daily basis. And that’s mighty high praise indeed.
The 370Z is more powerful than the car it replaces, sporting a 3.7-litre V6 to the 350Z’s 3.5-litre. Horsepower rises to 332 from 306, while torque climbs to 270 lb-ft from 268 lb-ft. But unusually for a makeover, it’s smaller overall, with wheelbase, overall length and height shorter, while width increases 30 mm increasing handling prowess while providing a bit more passenger comfort. Cargo capacity also opens up from 193 to 195 litres.
2009 Nissan 370Z Touring. Click image to enlarge |
But the real change is at the scale, where extensive use of aluminum and composite materials has helped slim the Z down by 52 kilograms, giving those extra horses even more ability to shine. The coupe starts at $39,998, almost $10,000 less than the MSRP on the 2008 model it replaces.
This machine’s a monster, with an incredible feel, delivering rich power through a fat powerband. And on top of that, Nissan has dropped in one of the most impressive technological goodies I’ve seen in a long time: a manual transmission that does its own heel-toe downshifting.
I know the purists are turning up their noses, sniffing that real drivers know the trick of rolling the foot to blip the throttle while braking and downshifting, matching the engine revs for a smooth transition. The reality is that it’s not easy for many people to learn how to do it – I’m still trying to get a smooth blip every time – and there’s no reason why the pleasure of a properly-shifted transmission should be limited to only a few hard-core drivers. In fact, I suspect that some owners may use the feature as a guide to learn how to do it themselves; most drivers don’t have the opportunity to sit alongside a trained track lapper, and it’s easier to learn if you know what you’re trying to accomplish.
2009 Nissan 370Z Touring. Click image to enlarge |
The system works incredibly well, regardless of how fast you’re going, how hard you brake, or how many gears you skip. Each gear change is effortlessly smooth, completely without shudder, and accompanied by a rasp out the twin pipes that’s music to the ears. You’d have to be very experienced on the track to do what this system flawlessly does, each and every time.
A downshift rev-matching feature is included with the optional seven-speed automatic transmission. The system is called SynchroRev Match on the six-speed stick, and it’s part of a $4,000 Sport Package that also throws in 19-inch super-lightweight alloy wheels, sport brakes, front chin spoiler, and rear spoiler. Purists can either leave off the package, in which case there’s no rev-matching ability, or if it’s ordered, they can simply shut the system off, and blip the throttle themselves – but it works so well that I’m guessing more than one, if he thinks his buddies aren’t watching, will be hitting the switch to turn it on. (The only other available option package is navigation, for an additional $2,500.)
Along with the throttle-blip ability – which stays on until you switch it off, which means you don’t have to keep hitting the button every time you restart the ignition – the instrument cluster readout also indicates what gear the transmission is in. I’ve often wondered why manual-shift-mode autoboxes tell you this, and yet manual transmissions don’t. Again, purists will scoff, but if you’ve ever been stuck mindlessly in rush-hour traffic and momentarily forgotten the shifter’s position, you’ll appreciate this added touch.
2009 Nissan 370Z Touring. Click image to enlarge |
Driving the 370Z is a wonderfully visceral experience. The car’s light weight is no doubt partly due to the fact that there doesn’t seem to be a single ounce of sound-deadening material in it anywhere. It’s all road noise, exhaust blips, and very stiff suspension, which will either make or break it with drivers. I loved the sound and the fury, but a couple of passengers complained about the noise, especially on a patch of rough highway; you’ll have to determine your comfort level. For me, it has the fiery temper of the GT-R, but enough manners to make it a viable driver in everyday traffic.
It’s exceptionally responsive, with great balance, nimble handling, and quick steering that’s just on the good side of twitchy. You can have some great fun throwing this car around, especially with its wide stance and light weight. The official fuel figures are 11.6 L/100 km in the city and 7.7 on the highway, while I managed 9.6 L/100 km in combined driving – and considering how much I thrashed it, I was extremely surprised to do so well.
American buyers can opt for an entry-level trim line (as well as a higher-performance Nismo package), but north of the border, the sole choice is the Touring trim. That gets you numerous standard features generally not found at this price: bi-xenon headlamps, leather and synthetic suede heated seats, automatic climate control, garage door opener, six-CD Bose stereo with satellite radio, Bluetooth connectivity, keyless remote with starter button, and tire pressure monitoring system, along with the expected leather-wrapped wheel, cruise control, heated mirrors, six airbags, and active head restraints.
As with any low-slung two-door, it’s very difficult to look graceful when getting in or out. And once inside, it’s very difficult to see in or out. The sloping hatch gives you a small slit of vision out the back, while the heavy haunches make shoulder checks pretty much pointless. Even peering over the hood was a chore for me, since I’m not very tall; the seatback is power-operated but the height adjustment is manual, and it doesn’t go very high. On the other hand, Nissan gave the seats some serious thought: the driver’s seat cushion is sculpted differently from the passenger’s, allowing for easier range of motion when using the pedals.
2009 Nissan 370Z Touring. Click image to enlarge |
The interior is a combination of some nicely-stitched leather and textured plastics, but with a couple of hard plastic pieces that look like they could scratch and weather easily. Three dials in the instrument cluster include one that gives exterior temperature readout, along with coolant temperature and fuel level indicated by a neat row of tiny orange lights, while the other two contain speedo and tach functions. Three more dials up top of the centre stack handle oil, battery and a clock. The optional navigation screen would normally take centre billing in the stack; lacking it, my tester substituted a shallow covered cubby.
Given the Z’s confining cabin – my friend reports it’s roomier than his model, but that’s relative – you’ll need to travel light up front. There’s but a single cupholder (although small water bottles can go into the door pockets), and a shallow console cubby box, plus the glovebox. Unlike the previous 350Z, there is a small cargo shelf behind each seat, and the passenger side’s includes a small pull-out compartment. The problem is getting to them. There’s not enough room to reach behind the seats to use them, and there’s no lever to flip the seatback ahead. Instead, you’ve got to use the electric recline to bring the seatback as far forward as it will go, which isn’t really enough to make these cubbies truly accessible and useful.
There’s more room under the hatch, and while the sloping glass does limit how much you can carry, a little judicious packing got me to a birthday party with two lawn chairs, a small cooler, a box of cookies and a gift.
Back in 2001, when Nissan reintroduced the temporarily discontinued Z with a bright orange concept car that became the 350Z, I went to a gathering of Z-car fans (and got to ride in the concept, which was quite an experience) who lived and breathed their favourite sports car. And after spending a week with the 2009 version, I understand their passion. It’s not a car for everyone, but it’s certainly worthy of high praise indeed.
|
Pricing: 2009 Nissan 370Z Touring
Click here for options, dealer invoice prices and factory incentives
Specifications
Competitors
Crash test results
|
View full article on one page
|




at 7:57 am
wow for $10k cheaper than previous models, tempting…
at 8:05 am
Full credit to Nissan- this is a SPORTS CAR, with no apologies for the omission of superfluous “padding”. Just great power-to-weight; two seats; ferociously cpmpetitive price; maybe a few too many gadgets, but altogether a solid effort. A proper descendent of the Datsun 240Z.
at 8:50 am
It’s amazing that the newer and better Z can be sold for $10K less. Great work Nissan. Makes you wonder how much they were overpriced to begin with.
at 9:53 am
For a bright red exterior, I give full points. For that interior – so many shades of grey. How sad. Not a lick of colour save for the dials.
The trunk looks much less boring with that colourful lawnchair and cooler in it. Why is it that makers of lawnchairs know their customers don’t want all grey monochromatic chairs, but car companies don’t.
Ford did a great thing with the modern t-bird where the exterior colour was matched by accents in the cab.
at 10:33 am
so, if you’re cruising along a nice windy country road in 4th and decide to shift, how does it know if you’re grabbing 3rd to accelerate or 5th to save gas?
at 12:58 pm
It’s apparently fast enough to detect what gear you’re selecting. I’ve read you can drop it into neutral, and as you move the stick near each gear you’ll see the revs match. they’ll also slowly drop as you coast down, so it’s adjusting real time for the speed of the car as well.
Ah well, I can still console myself that if I do a double clutch as well I’m saving the synchros while this robot is not
at 3:22 pm
Naturally aspirated was so last century, a 3 litre twin turbo with direct injection would have been a much better option, faster and use a lot less fuel on a day to day basis. Nissan has missed the boat.
at 9:50 pm
Mike, if you’re going to try to trash a car, can you maybe use a single fact, somewhere ? Exactly which 3.0 litre Twin Turbo DI. making 270 ft-lb are you referring to ? And how much fuel is “A lot”.
I hate to break it to you kid, but there is no magic.
Fuel consumption is primarily a function of power generated. In actual usage, a Turbo and a naturally aspirated engine which make the about the same power will use about the same fuel. Very few turbo engines deliver big fuel savings – mostly because the driver won’t keep his foot off the loud pedal.
And here’s another fact: the BMW 3 litre twin turbo, one of the best engines on the planet, available for $42K, if you get it with a 135i, is rated at 9.6l/100 km – that means it uses more gas than the Nissan. And I can guarantee you the Nissan will cost far less than the BMW in maintenance, over it’s life.
at 11:12 pm
In my opinion..the best sports car for around 50 grand at this moment. Virtually flawless. 135i and 335i are no match to the Z370. Job well done Nissan.
at 11:29 pm
Joe you are kidding rig a 2.5 l turbo can make that, let alone a 3 litre. Modern turbo have such a flat torque curve they are far better. BTW they save petrol by reducing pumping loss while on cruising.
at 1:01 am
WRX STi 290 lb-ft, 305 hp 0-100 4.9sec
evo 8 300 lb-ft 291hp
and these are 4 cylinder cars, a 6 cylinder would be even better.
Nissan evern had a 2.6L 6 cylinder from the 1996 gt-r that had 276lb-ft,300hp.
Although these all had poorer fuel economy this is mainly due to the AWD system, and in the case of the GTR had to run rich because they didn’t have DI.
at 1:35 am
Im glad they did not go turbo DI. Everyone thinks its great, the new DI engines. However they have problems too. Especially since its DI the valves get all gummy and clogged up ( no cleaning action from fuel)
This is a big problem in DI engines hardly any car testers talk about, or maybe they arent aware of it. Maybe they should to let people know what they are buying, pros of DI and cons.
Norm asp. or turbo beats DI
at 3:52 pm
The interior of the last 350Z was ugly and cheap.
at 12:18 am
The 135i would be a much easier car to live with on a daily basis. I’d trade off the vicerality and sports car styling of the Z for the civility and refinement of the Bimmer. That sitting-in-a-bathtub feeling gets old unless you’re 20 years old, trying to impress girls with your ride.
at 4:02 pm
“10k cheaper than the previous model”
Yep, but still 10k more than the US base model.
at 6:37 am
Re:
“10k cheaper than the previous model”
Yep, but still 10k more than the US base model.
- Going to be some great deals in the USA market in a years time to bring back to Canada.
at 11:23 pm
japanese porche hehehehe…cool car……