2010 Volvo XC60. Click image to enlarge |
|
Related articles on CanadianDriver
Manufacturer’s web site
|
Review and photos by Jil McIntosh
Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified Ads
Photo Gallery:
2010 Volvo XC60
Oshawa, Ontario – Every year at the auto show, there’s always one concept model that catches my eye and won’t let go. In 2007, it was Volvo’s XC60 Concept, a lovely little vehicle that forever banished any memory of boxy models with its flowing lines and wraparound taillights. Unfettered by the realities of production, concepts can vary considerably by the time they get to the assembly line, but the XC60 has made it to the showrooms with most of the touches that appealed to me in the first place, and with a driving experience that lives up to the promise.
This is a genuinely nice car: comfortable and sweet to drive, with enough sporty characteristic to keep it interesting. It’s relatively practical, beautifully styled, and should you want them and are willing to open your wallet, it can be equipped with a gaggle of active safety features. Included in the price is Volvo’s newest technology, a City Safety feature that will bring it to a halt if you’re about to bump the vehicle in front of you.
2010 Volvo XC60. Click image to enlarge |
All XC60 models currently available come in one configuration, with a turbocharged 3.0-litre six-cylinder T6 engine producing 281 horsepower, a six-speed automatic transmission with manual shift mode, and a Haldex all-wheel drive system that’s front-wheel biased under normal driving, but will transfer power to the rear if necessary. Pricing starts at $45,495, but that’s going to change in the future.
In June, Volvo announced that it will also equip the XC60 with a 235-horsepower, naturally-aspirated inline six-cylinder that’s also used in the S80, V70, XC70 and XC90. It’ll come in front-wheel drive, starting at $39,995, while a version with the all-wheel system with several other upgrades will be $44,495. My tester, the T6, will remain all-wheel only, but it will receive several new features and will rise to $49,995. While lower prices and more choice are always welcome, I suspect some of this may be due to the fact that the larger and very popular XC90 starts at $48,595: that’s just $3,100 more than the current base XC60, and that’s not a huge sum of money when you’re already up at this level. Options and upgraded trims can move most Volvo models into the stratosphere faster than the space shuttle, though: the price of my tester’s option list could have purchased a subcompact car. The XC60 will also add a new optional R-Design package, which upgrades the wheels and handling, among other features.
2010 Volvo XC60 (bottom photo by Greg Wilson). Click image to enlarge |
Smaller than the XC90, less outdoorsy-looking than the XC70, the XC60 falls into the upscale small SUV/crossover market that’s populated by such manufacturers as Lexus, Acura, Audi, Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Infiniti. Expect this niche to become wildly popular as North Americans fall out of their full-size SUVs but with an unwillingness to move into traditional cars.
The XC60 is based on a shortened version of the S80 sedan’s platform, which also makes it a cousin to the V70 and XC70, as well as the Land Rover LR2. Unlike the available-seven-passenger XC90, it’s strictly two rows of seats, for a maximum of five passengers.
The turbocharged six-cylinder is a very sweet engine. It makes 295 lb-ft of torque, and at a very low 1,500 r.p.m., making the XC60 very responsive to throttle pressure even as it delivers its power smoothly and quietly. The downside to the engine is that it isn’t terribly fuel-efficient: it’s rated only at 13.5 L/100 km in the city and 9.1 on the highway, and in combined driving I could only manage 12.4 L/100 km (23 mpg Imp). That’s certainly nothing to write home about, especially when several competitors can do much better in published city driving figures: 12.5 for the BMW X3, 12.5 for the Acura RDX, 13.3 for the Mercedes-Benz GLK, and 11.2 for the Volkswagen Tiguan. The upcoming non-turbo model will probably help somewhat; in the meantime, the T6’s thirst is partially offset by the fact that the recommended fuel is 87 octane.
2010 Volvo XC60. Click image to enlarge |
While it’s certainly no low-slung sports car, the XC60 is a considerable surprise when it’s taken out for twisting-road duty. It’s much more asphalt-adept and agile than its looks would suggest, with nimble handling, minimal body roll, sticky stability and smooth return from one turn to the next. Part of my tester’s Luxury Package was the Four-C Active Chassis, which provides three driver-selectable settings of Comfort, Sport and Advance that change the suspension tuning, transmission shift points and steering feel. The Comfort is exactly that, smoothing out the bumps and giving the wheel a light touch, although it isn’t so over-boosted that it feels sloppy. When the Sport or even more direct Advance is selected, the changes aren’t radically more aggressive, but they are noticeable, and they really add to the fun of driving this little ute. Despite its corner-carving ability, though, the XC60 still offers considerable ground clearance of 230 mm (9 inches), which came in handy over some high curbs when I wanted to access a spot for some photos. Even so, it isn’t so tall that it’s difficult to get in or out of it; in that regard, the XC60 feels more like a large car.
This being a Volvo, the primary focus is safety, and the company is using this model to debut its new City Safety. While I expected it to be an option, it’s a standard feature. Volvo says that 75 per cent of all collisions occur at speeds below 30 km/h – most of them, it seems, caused by drivers who are paying attention to anything other than the vehicle in front of them when they’re meandering in parking lots or in stop-and-go traffic. The system, which can be shut off if not wanted, uses a laser sensor to measure the distance between the XC60 and a vehicle in front. Active at speeds of between four and 30 km/h, the system first pre-charges the brakes, reduces the throttle, and illuminates the brake lights to warn drivers behind. If the driver is still oblivious, the system automatically applies the brakes and brings the vehicle to a halt – quite late in the travel, and with jarring force that’ll really get your attention and maybe learn ya for next time. At lower speeds, it will avoid the collision; at higher ones, Volvo says it will reduce the severity of impact. Be aware, though, that the system can only detect wide objects such as other vehicles, and it’s still up to you to avoid knocking over pedestrians.
2010 Volvo XC60 – City Safety, low-speed auto brake; image courtesy Volvo. Click image to enlarge |
The company demonstrates the system using pylons, and in a test in my driveway, it worked each time – providing I didn’t tap the brakes or move the steering wheel, which “tells” the system I’m in control and I don’t need it. It’s a marvellous piece of engineering, but I’m still of the theory that a combination of better driver training, regular testing, getting rid of drive-through restaurant windows and a complete ban on all telephone calls by drivers in moving vehicles, hand-held or otherwise, would be far better than relying on lasers and electronics. My tester was also equipped with a system of collision warning and auto-braking, which does the same thing at higher speeds, so that my vehicle would, in theory, never be found with its nose buried in someone else’s rear bumper.
2010 Volvo XC60. Click image to enlarge |
The XC60’s standard safety list also includes stability and traction control, pyrotechnic pretensioners on all seatbelts, active head restraints, and side and curtain airbags. Optional items are adaptive cruise control that automatically adjusts for other vehicles in front, a blind spot information system that warns when another car is alongside, collision warning with auto brake, distance alert to warn if you’re too close to the car ahead, driver alert control that beeps and flashes if it suspects you’re falling asleep, lane departure warning to notify if you’re drifting out of your lane, a personal car communicator that warns if someone has broken into your vehicle and is waiting for you to return by sensing the intruder’s heartbeat, and power-operated rear-door child locks. With almost all of them packed into my tester, the warning lights in the doors, the head-up display on the windshield, and all the warning chimes and lights could be a little overwhelming at times.
Inside, the XC60 could easily be the centerfold from Better Scandinavian Homes and Gardens (although it’s built in Belgium). Heated leather seats are standard, lovely chairs that stay comfortable on long drives and can be ordered in two-tone at no extra charge. It features Volvo’s signature “floating” centre console, which looks good but really is impractical, as its design doesn’t allow for any cubbies up top, and the small one that it creates below is small, difficult to reach, and so low-sided that items will tumble out on hard turns. I’ve always found Volvo’s centre stack controls to be overrun with too-small buttons, and the XC60 is no exception – perhaps those who rear-end others in traffic are simply trying to figure out how to turn on the defroster – although I’ve always been charmed by the little chrome figure whose body is actually the buttons for the vent mode. My tester’s optional navigation system offered two methods of input, both of them unusual: a set of buttons on the steering wheel for my use, and a separate remote control for the use of a passenger. Once I figured out where the “enter” button was on the wheel, though, it was quite easy to use the map system.
Three can sit across the rear seat, but if you’re only taking two, they can pull down a combination armrest/storage cubby/cupholder between them. The cargo area on mine included an optional grocery bag holder, and a clever unit it is: a panel on the floor lifts up and stays upright, with hooks to hold plastic bags. Pulling up the entire cargo floor panel reveals several divided cubbies. With the seats up, the cargo space is 100 cm long; the seats fold flat, without removing the head restraints, for a length of 170 cm. For even longer loads, the front passenger seat drops down as well, for a total length of 280 cm.
Volvo may have erred in introducing the XC60 in top-line trim, because it’s a hefty chunk of paycheque; the upcoming under-$40K and presumably less-thirsty 3.2 FWD model may bring in more crowds. It deserves to be on the test drive list, though: it’s gorgeous, fun to drive, all-day comfortable, and it’s just an all-around, genuinely nice vehicle. Volvo can be justifiably proud of the job it’s done on this one.
|
Pricing: 2010 Volvo XC60 T6 AWD
(Luxury Package of Four-C Active Chassis, front and rear parking assist, rain sensor, active bending headlights and heated rear seats, $3,050; Convenience Package of garage door opener, speed-sensitive steering, interior air quality system, mass movement sensor, sunglass holder, rear power child locks, cargo area grocery bag holder, power-operated liftgate and level sensor, $2,100; Tech Package of Collision Avoidance System [adaptive cruise control, collision warning with auto brake, lane departure warning, driver alert control, and distance alert], personal car communicator with keyless drive, premium Dynaudio sound system with Dolby Pro-Logic II surround sound, blind spot information system and retractable mirrors, $4,100; metallic paint, $790; classic wood inlays, $600; wood steering wheel, $350; navigation system with DVD map data and remote control, $2,100; and rear parking camera, $1,100) Click here for options, dealer invoice prices and factory incentives
Specifications
Competitors
Crash test results
|
View full article on one page
|




at 7:45 am
That price-as-tested figure is astounding, although if this Volvo can truly be called the safest vehicle on the road, it might be worth it. It’s certainly one of the nicest looking SUVs out there.
at 9:53 am
Ahhh…. comments like the above always make you feel all warm and fuzzy on the inside…
at 10:19 am
I agree Mazda6 Guy. Half the reason GM stayed alive as long as it did was because the had narrow-minded people like “Saturn man” on their side. I’m surprised people like him even read what auto journalists have to say. After all, GM makes the best products in every class (heavy sarcasm). Just because Ford owned Volvo, doesn’t mean that Volvo just rebadged Ford products. Rebadging is GM’s trick.
at 12:38 pm
Saturn Man…Update…Saturn is no longer part of Government Motors..
at 4:34 pm
Yeah, Saturn Man. General Motors for life: “Not only do we count welfare recipients as our primary customers, we’re on welfare too!”
at 5:21 pm
Saturn Man be damned… uneducated fool is driving the worst made sack of shite in the world…..
at 9:11 pm
I don’t see why the author uses imperial gallons (British) for fuel consumption. So, 12.4L/100km equates to 19 mpg (US gallons)-that’s crappy combined fuel consumption.
at 9:55 pm
Nice looking SUV but more expensive than a BMW X3, an Audi Q5, a Mercedes GLK ($4000 more), an Infiniti EX35 ($5000),an Acura ($4000),almost $20 000 more than the VW Tiguan that is also good looking and probably as fun to drive and as safe. What are they thinking?
The fuel consumption is one or the highest.
And if you look to JD Power , ”Protégez-vous” Volvo products are the less dependable of those products. With their maintenance that is ridiculously expensive this is bad news. Also ,their resale value is one of the worst on the market. The journalists tend to forget those important aspects.
I’ve also heard that the aftersales service is mediocre.
I’ve read Volvo is on the brink of bankruptcy
For now it would be one of my last choice.
I would wait few years to be reassure about their reliability (and maybe that they will come down to earth about their preposterous pricing) before buying a Volvo.
at 3:12 am
Does the Vue’s interior even holda a candle to the XC60’s? Does it offer cutting-edge safety features like the XC60’s? Does it even compete in the same class? No, no, and no!
Anyways. Ignore the trolls.
It’s a great CUV. Good size, comfortable, and looks great. But I wish they’d brought the more fuel efficient powertrain here first. One a day-to-day basis, for most consumers the T6 engine is too much for the XC60; the only thing they’re going to notice is the high fuel consumption. My dad almost certainly would have gone for this over the A4 Avant if the 3.2 or diesel option were available sooner, but an extra 4L/100 km is too much for slightly more space and a higher ride height.
at 6:40 am
Only Saturn Vue that was worth considering was previous generation V6 because it had Honda engine and transmission.
at 9:20 am
Hurry up and get your two cents in, before the CENSORSHIP POLICE closes the comments site.
– You’ll notice that the comments are only closed once trolls like yourself wade in with your wit-laced comments. Keep it up and it’ll happen again. LOOKOUT! HERE COME THE CENSORSHIP POLICE!!!1one! WOO-HOO!!!
at 12:05 pm
Weren’t you that said quote “Maturity for life”? I see your one of those guys that don’t mean what they say.
– I mean exactly what I say. Which is why comments will be closed down if the useless trash talk continues.
at 12:27 pm
I bought a Volvo 142E in 1971 when they first came out. Great seats but couldn’t track on the highway – hard to keep in a straight line, injectors leaked, suspension bushings went after warranty period plus the paint rusted under each door within 2 years. What a piece of junk…
at 12:36 pm
funny, I had one of those and did 475,000 miles in it and it never missed a beat….drove beautifully in a straight line….
at 1:27 pm
My ‘72 Nova is better than the new Volvo
at 1:48 pm
I too had a 1971 142E, reliable, drove exceptionally well and saved my wife’s life when she rolled it at 70 mph. Regarding JDPower, anyone who is knowledgeable about automobiles knows that they aren’t reliable in their opinions at all. Adjutor probably can’t afford to buy any of the vehicles he mentioned. People buy automobiles for their own reasons, not because of the somewhat simple minded nonsense he inaccurately talks about. I have owned Volvos, Audis, Mercedes, Fords, and more. They all had good and bad characteristics.
at 2:59 pm
Mr. Editor, Did I just called your bluff? LMAO!
– Nope.
at 6:56 pm
Hi mister Terrier. Your comment is contemptuous and arrogant. You are talking without knowing. I can afford any of these vehicles (they are 40 to $50 000 cars not $100 000 cars) if I was a fan of SUVs witch I’m not. I like to drive too much and I dont need such a big car. I need a fun to drive, safe, reliable, awd car. I live in a region with long and heavy winter.
I had a honda, 2 subarus ( I’m currently driving a wrx 265),a Volvo awdR in 1998 or 1999,a 2000 audi S4 . I had many problems with it but nothing close as my 2004 Volvo S60R :the worst lemon I ever had or heard about.
In ” La presse ” ( A Montreal newspaper)the respected automobile journalist Eric Lefrancois also call it a lemon ( he wrote ”bide” in french). You could be right about JD Power (you surely are a more reliable reference than them!!) but the consumer magazine ”Protégez-vous” is THE consumer guide in Quebec.
You can also look to the Chris Chase 2008/01/10 V70/xc70 review ( canadian driver) and the Justin Pritchard 2008/12/08 V70/xc70 review. Probably that they dont know anything about cars either!!
Many years ago Volvos were more dependable cars. It is no more a reality. We are in 2009 not 1971. ( Was I born in 1971?!) In the 70’s Montreal Canadians was the best hockey team in the NHL. Things change!!! Stop living in the past!!
Volvo could change their motto ” Volvo for life”’ for ”Volvo, problems for life” ( too easy)
As for safety, I give them credits for their research on that matter. But most of Volvo products are not first in the safety list, except for the C30. Check by yourself. Dont ask your Volvo dealer!!
Their pricing and the fuel consumption of the xc60 is higher than the other cars. That is a fact.
Their resale value is one of the worst on the market :fact.
They had serious financial problems :fact.
So mister Terrier, what I wrote was based on facts and personnal experience ( and some of my friends experience) and you’re right, cars all have good and bad characteristics. Some have more bad characteristics than others!
at 9:06 pm
These comments are ridiculous – obviously written by those we do not have enough money to buy a compact car, and who now feel that they can make blanket statements. The argument that the car is poor because “the company is on the brink of bankruptcy” is sheer stupidity – many car companies are in the red, including Toyota. Mr P Landry makes statements based on his alleged ownership of a Volvo (bought new?) – which car, including Lexus does not have issues (based on experiences of a friend). So long cars remain machines, they will have problems. Resale? If that is your issue, your choice will be very limited, but for those who buy for pleasure, resale does not factor in. Safety – yes, based on extremely deficient and limited government testing, many cars score the same, but those tests are very artificial. So until you can devise a way to measure real life saftey, I’ll take Volvo’s word and let you ride in your Impala.
There have been countless postive reviews about the XC60, V/XC70 and S80 – critisism is limited to the price of the vehicles, even in Sweden, where Volvo was once a middle of the range car, and but pushing into the luxury market.
I own a new XC70 – give me a car with character any day over the countless morons who drive their 3 series BMWs.
at 9:50 pm
Machines always have problems, yes, but Volvos (as this is the company we’re talking about; they’re not the only one here) have just as many issues as many other European cars do.
I might bet my life on some of the safety features Volvo bakes into its cars, but not on the reliability of some of the recent models.
at 10:17 pm
My sisters ‘97 850 is the worst car anyone in my family has ever owned. Things have broken down and failed that I’ve never even heard of before. And to top it off, the cost to fix anything requires a kidney removal.
at 11:07 pm
Hello M. rovermark. Can you explain what makes BMW drivers more morons than Audi,Subaru,Volvo, Mazda or any other cars drivers. A little conptemtuous maybe?
BMW are great cars to drive. Any journalist will tell you.
Take the time to read before you write. I drive a subaru not an impala. Anyway, people who drive impalas or any cars have the right to like it.
Yes, my Volvo was brand new. The transmission broke down at 2500km more or less. Then the suspension, twice. The AWD system. the tie rod end, noise and vibration problems, brake problems, engine problems (sudden loss of power). For that problem my car stayed nearly 3 months at the dealer. They were not able to find the problem. I’ve called Volvocanada I was told by Mr D. and Miss M. (his supervisor ) that it was not their problem. During that time 2 of the courtesy cars they lend me brokedown. Maybe anecdotal, but very unpleasant. So I’ve changed my lemon for a Subaru. I had problem to have more than $11 000 (it was the price on the market) for my unaccidented 75 000km 2004 S60R I’ve paid nearly $64 000 before taxes. And yes,after that car, resale value became a factor.
I did not make relation between the financial state of Volvocorporation and their cars being poor. Their less then average dependability makes them ”poor” cars. Anyway ,I dont think they’re poor cars. I think they are not dependable and too expensive ($61 000 for a XC 60 even fully equiped,it is pretty expensive). Like I’ve wrote, it is one of the most or the most expensive SUVs of the list of Jil McIntosh.
Your XC70 gives you satisfaction, fine . We discuss about Volvo cars in general not about your car or you. A bit narcissistic maybe?
My personnal and few friends experiences are indeed anecdotal. But JD Power, Protégez-vous magazine, Eric Lefancois, Chris Chase and Justin Pritchard reviews (automobile journalists) are not. Take a look to those interesting article, If I remember well, one of them gives you a link talk to a class action lawsuit against Volvo. ( It think it concerns their dependability).
Sure , Lexus and Toyota cars can have problems but statistically, in average, they are much more dependable. This is a fact.
I know Toyota lost a lot of money, but being in the red? Then again,this is not the point.
The goverment safety test are maybe deficient and limited, but for now it is the best thing we have. Unless you can furnish better test.
And you are right Volvo tries to push into the luxury market.They failed. For now, even if you would like to tell that you are driving a luxury car, except for their pricing , they dont have the ‘’something” and the image that Mercedes and BMW have.
Finally, Mr rovermark, you totally have the right to be a Volvoman and I have the right to think that Volvo sucks but dont take things so personnally, it is not good for the heart!!
at 12:38 am
Do your thing Mr. Editor.
at 12:45 am
Let me clarify, censor the above comments too. Do you have what it takes, piss off all of the readers. Let me know what your boss thinks of you on your next job performance eval.
at 12:21 pm
The reviewer reported what she liked and did not like in the short time span in which she was able to evaluate this vehicle. Some people will not like the review because of the bad personal experiences they have had with Volvo. These experiences should have no bearing on the reviewer’s report. They may, and some will argue they should, have a bearing on whether you as an individual decide to buy a Volvo.
Others will look to the review to help them create a short list of vehicles to test drive and consider for their next purchase.
to rovermark….
i would not consider myself a moron for driving a 3 series…..i love the balanced combination of handling, braking, ride and sport I get each and every time i sit and drive my car anywhere…(more than my maxima). When I last drove a volvo (3 years ago) I got the impression that volvos were made for drivers who did not enjoy driving, or were afraid of it as they most likely view it as a task, or some chore they have to do. However, reading this review would make me consider this vehicle when i go shopping in January 2010 as the birth of our 3 child approaches.
at 2:55 pm
Rorie, you might not consider yourself to be a moron, but everyone else does!
As far as this Volvo is concerned…let me see more expensive than BMW X3, Audi Q5, Mercedes and Infiniti EX35, Acura, VW Tiguan. Given that the VW Tiguan is a typical unreliable VW (and has a stupid name) I would pay more for the Volvo. Given that the Audi, Mercedes and BMW are also unreliable and expensive to repair and not really SUV’s, I would give it to the Volvo. However, this is no Infiniti, Lexus or Acura they win hands down!
The fuel consumption stinks, the styling is terrible, Volvo’s are not dependable, the company in on the brink, the dealer network is week….
WTF…why are we even reading this..who would by this POS?
at 12:18 am
“Now, now children….play nice”
at 7:21 am
Joe,
I learned a long time ago that buying on price and apparent dependability reports (most are surveys where actual reliability is questionable as everyone has a different definition and memory, yes memory as you fill out the questionnaire comes into play when you fill out the report, having written some of those reports I can also tell you that interpretation is not without bias…and that is key…BIAS!!!)) is only part of the equation. If being a moron is looking at the whole forest and understanding how it works , and not being a moron is looking at a tree or two that appeal to you in the same forest, then I would take being a moron any day . Did any of this go over your head…yes… i thought so!
at 11:38 am
Hi Rorie Shade. Bias maybe but… If you ask to 1000 Volvo and 500 say they had problems with the car and you ask 1000 Honda owners and 200 say they had problems. If 10 different surveys come to the same conclusion, sure there is always a bias ( it is not possible to do a double-blinded with placebo study !!) but you cannot deny a heavy tendency.
Pleasure to drive, car design… are subjective. But fuel efficiency , dealer network, pricing, resale value, maintenance cost… are objective.
The question is : do you like the car enough to pay more for the car, spend more for the fuel, risking having lot more problems (even with the not perfect surveys), to buy a product from a company with an uncertain future ,did you had a good or a bad experience with this company … .For me the anwser is easy. Some of my friends or colleague and I had an awful experience with Volvo (the car , the company ) so I wont buy another Volvo. But I know it could be different for someone else. This forum should be use to share informations not to insult other readers.
at 7:51 am
Rorie you been sitting in the Shade to long. Get some sun.
at 5:49 pm
Honest Man these are words of wisdom and truth.
If you want to have “more fun” talk to a Volvocanada customer relation representative. Advice :take a load of valium before.