Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise
Canada's Online Auto Magazine

Jil

Home
Classifieds
Contests
Auto News
New Vehicles
First Drives
Test Drives
Inside Story
Luxury Cars
Trucks
RVs
Buyer's Guide
Price Guide
Photos
Features
Bring it on!
50-Litre Challenge
Green Scene
More features
Winter Driving
Advice
Steering You Right
Product Reviews
Book Reviews
Calculators
Crossword
Used Car Reviews
Auto Shows
New York 2009
Vancouver 2009
Toronto 2009
Montreal 2009
Detroit 2009
Los Angeles 2008
Auto Tech
Classics
CarTalkCanada
Forums
Blogs
Web Directory
Search CanadianDriver
Browse the Archive
www.canadiandriver.com

September 17, 2009
Share |
Subscribe to RSS Feed

Test Drive: 2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid 4×4

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid. Click image to enlarge

Related articles on CanadianDriver
First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra Hybrid

Manufacturer’s web site
General Motors Canada

Join CanadianDriver’s Facebook group
Follow CanadianDriver on Twitter

Review and photos by Jil McIntosh

Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified Ads

Photo Gallery:
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid

Oshawa, Ontario – When hybrid vehicles first appeared in our showrooms, size was a major factor: the Honda Insight and Toyota Prius were small vehicles. When the technology eventually made its way into large SUVs, I always thought of them as low-fat potato chips: just as those are better than regular snacks, but not as healthy as an apple, it would seem to make sense for many buyers to just get into a smaller car.

That isn’t always an option, though, especially when the vehicle in question is needed for serious work. And so General Motors has taken the hybrid system it uses in the Suburban, Yukon and Escalade hybrids, and has fitted it to the pickup siblings of the Chevrolet Silverado and my tester, the GMC Sierra. Toyota and Dodge have indicated that the Tundra and Ram will receive similar gas-electric systems, possibly by 2010, but for now, the GM versions are the sole hybrid trucks on the market.

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid. Click image to enlarge

General Motors first offered the Silverado and Sierra as hybrids for 2005, but these new trucks are entirely different. The earlier versions were “mild” hybrids, with an electric motor that only assisted the gasoline engine when needed. The new models can operate on gasoline or battery alone, depending on conditions, which gives them their name of 2-Mode Hybrid. As with all hybrids, the gasoline engine stops running at idle, such as when stopped at a traffic light, providing it isn’t too cold outside and the battery is sufficiently charged. This not only saves fuel, but eliminates tailpipe emissions, and since the electric motor restarts the gasoline engine, there’s no worry about wearing out a conventional starter.

The 2-Mode comes solely with a 6.0-litre V8 engine, also used in conventional pickups. While you might initially question using such a big powerplant, the Sierra Hybrid gets better fuel economy than the 4.8- or 5.3-litre V8 engines available in GM’s conventional model, and even better than the available 4.3-litre V6, while still retaining acceptable towing and hauling capacity. Part of the fuel savings comes from the engine’s Active Fuel Management system, which shuts off half the cylinders under light load, such as when cruising on the highway; thanks to the electric motor’s additional power boost, the truck can stay in this fuel-saving mode for longer periods of time. My 4×4 tester is officially rated at 10.5 L/100 km (27 mpg) in the city, and 9.8 L/100 km (29 mpg) on the highway, while I averaged 12.1 L/100 km (23 mpg) in combined driving. In comparison, a conventional 6.0-litre 4×4 Sierra gets 15.7 L/100 km (18 mpg) in the city.

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid. Click image to enlarge

As with any hybrid, the trade-off is the price. The Sierra Hybrid is going to be a low-volume seller, and so choices are limited: you can only get it as a four-door crew cab with short box, in either 4×2 or 4×4 configuration. It comes as a fairly loaded trim line, starting at $46,725 for the 4×2, and $50,875 in 4×4. The hybrid’s list of equipment puts it about halfway between the Sierra SLE trim line, which starts at $34,910 for 4×2, and the SLT, which starts at $43,065. Average those out, and you’re looking at a premium of about $7,700 for the hybrid system. Transport Canada estimates you’ll save about $680 each year in fuel over the conventional model, so it’ll take some time to even that out.

Standard features on the Hybrid include trailer package, electronic stability control, 18-inch chrome-clad wheels, heated mirrors, soft tonneau cover, variable intermittent wipers, Bluetooth, power windows, keyless entry, split-bench cloth seat, satellite radio, leather-wrapped wheel, dual-zone automatic climate control, cruise control, and carpet. An upgrade package can be added, for $7,340, which adds power-adjustable bucket seats, navigation system, hard tonneau cover, rear parking assist, rear defogger and garage door opener. I didn’t have that package on my tester, but mine was equipped with several stand-alone options, including leather bucket seats, rear-seat DVD system, power-folding mirrors, sunroof and fog lamps, for a total of $57,885 before freight and taxes.

That’s a fair chunk of change, and one of the complaints I tend to have about hybrids: given that the general idea is to save money on fuel, it would seem to make more sense to equip them sparingly and sell them for less to those who’d like to simply save more money overall. In the case of a hybrid pickup truck, which would likely return its premium much faster to a tradesman than to a casual user, outfitting the Sierra as a work truck with steel wheels, manual air and vinyl floor, at lower cost, would probably have more buyers interested.

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid. Click image to enlarge

As with all currently-available factory hybrids, you don’t plug the Sierra in to recharge the battery. Rather, the system captures and converts braking energy, which it stores in the battery pack that’s located under the rear seat. Having it there eliminates the under-seat storage space offered by the conventional Sierra crew cab (the rear cushion folds up as a single unit, unlike the gas-only Sierra’s split seat), but there’s really no other place to put it. The system works automatically, switching between gasoline, electricity, and a combination of the two whenever required; that depends on several factors, including battery charge, ambient temperature, vehicle speed, and how heavy you are on the accelerator. When I got caught in some nasty rush-hour traffic on a Toronto-area highway, I was able to inch along past two exits solely on electricity, using no fuel and spewing no emissions. GM says the truck can go up to about 40 km/h on electricity alone, but no matter how light my foot, I couldn’t get it to go that high; I generally got up to about half that before the engine kicked in. When the gas engine does come to a stop, or when it’s running on battery alone, the climate control, lights and stereo continue to operate.

There are several devices to help you with fuel economy: the driver information centre can be set to show instantaneous and average fuel numbers, and if the truck has the optional navigation system, it can also display the flow of power. There’s also an “Eco” gauge in the cluster, but its green bar design is far too minimalistic. Only by delving into the owner’s manual do you discover that the idea is to keep the needle in the middle, and that too far to one side means you’re accelerating too hard, while the other side means you’re not letting the regenerative braking do its work. It doesn’t have to be as fancy as the sprouting-leaves display on the Ford Fusion Hybrid, but a couple of simple pictures would help explain exactly what the gauge is measuring.

The Hybrid can’t do quite as much heavy lifting as its conventional siblings, but for most buyers, it’s probably more than enough. While gasoline-only Sierras can tow between 9,500 and 10,600 lbs when they’re properly equipped, the Hybrid can pull 6,100 lbs in 4×2 configuration, and 5,900 lbs as a 4×4. Payload is 1,459 lbs in 4×2, and 1,418 lbs in 4×4. While I haven’t tried it myself, other writers have found that the Sierra can tow in electric-only mode under the right conditions.

Overall, the Sierra Hybrid generally looks and feels conventional, save for the massive decals that GM has plastered across the doors and windows. The transition from gasoline to electric is pretty much seamless; occasionally you’ll hear an electric motor whirring, or feel a little jolt that’s similar to a transmission shifting gears, but nothing so loud or hard that it’s objectionable. Handling is accurate, the steering is easy but not too light, and the brakes are firm and bite close to the top of the pedal. In short, it’s a good, solid truck.

2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid
2009 GMC Sierra Hybrid. Click image to enlarge

The interior set new truck standards when the Sierra was redesigned for 2007, and while Dodge and Ford have since worked over the Ram and F-150 and have surpassed it, it’s still handsome, and my optional cowhide seats proved very comfortable. The bucket seats also include a massive centre console with open storage, and between that, the deep console box, the twin gloveboxes, an open dash cubby and the big door pockets, all of your small-item storage should be easily handled. Interior build quality is excellent. My truck was the last of its breed to come from GM’s Oshawa, Ontario plant, before that truck division was shut down; 2010 models will now come from Mexico.

My truck also contained Turn-by-Turn Navigation, an OnStar program that is meant to take the place of a traditional navigation system. You hit the OnStar button, tell the live operator your destination, and he or she downloads the directions into your vehicle. Each turn is then indicated by a command that comes through the stereo, and an arrow in the instrument cluster. It’s great in theory, but in reality, I’ve found it to be as much miss as hit in the various vehicles in which I’ve tried using it. On a California trip, one operator forgot to download the directions to our vehicle; another couldn’t find a town in her system, even though we were sitting in front of its large “Welcome To” sign. Trying to find a street in Niagara-on-the-Lake, an Ontario town very popular with tourists, I was routed to an American operator who told me the only street by that name was actually in “Gee-yule-up.” Mystified, I finally had her spell it out: she meant Guelph, some 120 km away. Both towns have a Lakeshore Road, but so does every other settlement near Lake Ontario. And despite the fact that my house has been here since the 1940s, OnStar can’t find it. It consistently sends me to a dead-end street about four kilometres north that sounds nothing like my road’s name, tells me to turn, and then informs me that I’ve arrived, repeating my house number and street. This time around, I pushed the Sierra’s OnStar button again, and got an operator who tried to find my address manually, couldn’t, and told me to hold on while he talked to his supervisor. He then disconnected the call and never came back. I’m glad I wasn’t depending on it to find my way.

The mapping system aside, the Sierra Hybrid is a very nice ride, offering considerable fuel savings over a comparable conventional vehicle, decent work capacity for its system, handsome styling, comfortable interior, and good performance. For now, it’s also the only hybrid choice for a pickup, but its tipping point is its price: it’s not cheap, and that’s going to be an issue for drivers who will have to weigh the extra cost against any savings reaped at the gas pumps. It’s a great truck if it fits your bottom line, but be sure to figure the calculations before you buy.

Pricing: 2009 GMC Sierra 2-Mode Hybrid 4×4
  • Base price: $50,875
  • Options: $7,010 (Six-way power leather bucket seats, $2,410; rear DVD entertainment system, $1,750; power sunroof, $1,480; power-folding mirrors with integrated turn signals and driver’s side auto-dimming, $350; hard folding tonneau cover, $330; rear audio controls, $275; front fog lamps, $220; auto-dimming rearview mirror, $120; block heater, $75)
  • A/C tax: $100
  • Freight: $1,300
  • Price as tested: $59,285
    Click here for options, dealer invoice prices and factory incentives

    Specifications
  • Specifications: 2009 GMC Sierra

    Competitors
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Chevrolet Silverado
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Dodge Ram
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Ford F-series
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Nissan Titan
  • Buyer’s Guide: 2009 Toyota Tundra

    Crash test results
  • National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
  • View full article on one page
    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Jil McIntosh is a freelance writer, a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC) and Assistant Editor for CanadianDriver.com. Her personal website can be found at www.JilMcIntosh.com

    More GMC...
    More Green Scene...
    More Hybrid...
    More Test Drives...
    More Trucks...

    Share |
    Subscribe to RSS Feed

    Comments on this article -- 23


    This site needs to stop using 4.5 liters for a gallon. I’m fine with you using L/100km but stop with the UK gallons and making things look better than they are. The line should read 12.1L/100km(18mpg)highway and 15.7L/100km(15mpg)city. Canada needs to top advertising in UK mpg, we buy petrol in Canada or the US, we buy in liters or gallons that equal 3.8L.


    You realize that Canada uses Imperial gallons because of our ties to England, right? We’re going to keep using the units that the Canadian government provide for fuel consumption. Adopting the U.S. gallon measure on a Canadian site would be irresponsible and would cause even more confusion, trust me.

    I agree that the difference between the two gallon measurements is confusing, but if we really want to make things simple, then talk to the U.S. about adopting the Metric system and doing away with gallons altogether.


    Just because things are a certain way doesn’t make it right. If an idea is wrong to begin with and people follow, the idea is still wrong. What can you buy in Canada with a 4.5L gallons? Nothing I use for home or work. CanadianDriver should just post L/100km and let the readers convert for themselves.


    We don’t use miles for anything either in Canada. I agree with Chris’s point that we use UK gallons here, and with Ryan’s that L/100km is the only relevant measurement anymore.


    Why not a hyperlink? State mpg, and then just roll the cursor over the figure and l./100km are shown. And everyone’s happy.


    Nice review – love the bit about the On-Star navigation – I’ll stick to my Garmin I think.

    I’ve always wondered why they didn’t do hybrid systems in heavier vehicles first. I would think it would make more of a difference here where you’re talking about a 5,000+lbs vehicle starting from a dead stop. All that fuel is used up to get that large mass rolling – once rolling the gas engine really just has to keep it moving. I would have thought that it would have been more of a savings in MPG (or L/100kms) than just 5mpg.

    I agree with DRyanC though – We SHOULD be posting US gallons – its what most of us are used to reading online and most car magazines (lets face it most are US based)

    Whether or not the states should convert is not really the issue (imagine the cost for them to convert!? Not to mention all the mishaps that would happen as a result. Look at that Mars mission that was a write off because the whole metric/imperial fiasco). People in Canada usually deal in US gallons – not UK gallons.

    I think Alex’s point about a hyperlink or maybe just a “mouse-over” event where it lists the L/100kms in BOTH UK AND US Gallons.


    We are in Canada. Transport Canada numbers are published in UK gallons. It would be irresponsible of CD to not use the proper Transport Canada numbers. Your issue is really with the Canadian government, not CD.

    That said, l/100km is the more useful measurement anyway, so that’s the only one you should really pay attention to.


    Here is a recent quote on on real world MPG from last months test Canadian Driver drive test on the same truck rebadged as a Silverado.

    “Earlier this year I drove this hybrid on a highway run to Ottawa (from Brampton, Ontario). …..I set the cruise at 120 km/h / 75 mph and did the trip of 503 km / 312 miles on 75 L / 16.5 gallons CND / 19.8 gallons US of regular fuel – or 14.9 L/100 km (18.9 mpg CND/15.8 mpg US). The return trip data was almost identical. Since then I’ve gotten some emails asking why I was speeding – I mention this only because I make it a habit to drive like the majority of population – in other words, real world speeds that net real world fuel consumption.”

    I tend to believe the real world 15 MPG consumption on the GM rebadge hybrid Job, than the one listed here. No offense Jill, but readers are more interested in real world MPG.


    For those complaining about the Imperial MPG, there are a lot of people, myself included, who appreciate the conversion back to a unit of measurement that is reasonably comprehensible. A true rate is a ratio between two units where one of the units has a value of ONE. Thus 24 miles per 1 gallon. Personally, I always thought having a bigger Canadian gallon than that of the USA, was a point of pride and another distinguishing feature of what it meant to be Canadian. Keep it up Jil and Canadian Driver.


    ” No offense Jill, but readers are more interested in real world MPG.”

    Please note that I did also include my real-world mileage.


    I would have to go with the Review and photos by Howard Elmer, Silverado 4WD hybrid, real-world mileage. No true truck driver babies their truck.


    It’s funny how the anti-GM guys won’t accept that the Hybrid trucks are capable of good fuel economy and will cling to the only negative review that I’ve seen on any internet auto site. Remember, this is a 6.0L engine, and it still delivers better mileage than all smaller engine offerings in all full size trucks. Anyone who doubts this can just check the results from CarandDriver, Motortrend, or Driving Television. And again, Howard’s review was done with all highway driving on cruise control, where a hybrid powertrain is sparingly used. If it had done a larger share in the city, his results would have been much different.


    Real world MPG for a 6.0 liter V8 and a four speed two mode transmission placed on a vehicle with the aerodynamics of a box nets 15 real world MPG, PERIOD.


    I drive the speed limit to purposely tick those behind me off. I signal, only to offend those behind me enough so that they ride out into the opposing lane wanting to pass me, even though I’m about to turn in that direction. I brake slowly and use the transmission to slow me down driving down steeper hills, which offends some people who like racing to a stop sign that will floor their vehicle to get around me, only for me to lose planned braking distance, and of course, they never signal, because they can’t multitask behind the wheel yet they can talk on the phone, eat a burger and drink a coffee all the while trying to ‘drive’.

    Hybrids are overpriced for a reason. The technology costs money, and the manufacturers are trying to recoup some of the costs as most makes lose money on the hybrids they do produce and sell. If someone feels like saving a few hundred bucks a year in gas if they buy a hybrid model, then that’s fine, all the power to them if they think they’re helping save the environment. But when they drive like in the examples I stated above, nobody wins, irregardless at how efficient, or inefficient a vehicle is made to be.

    I remember the days when people bought trucks for a purpose, not a want. They bought cars for necessity, not for fun. They bought motorcycles for enjoying the drive, not cutting in between traffic giving the small portion of bikers that do obey the rules of the road.

    Soon, we’ll all be driving class 8 trucks because they’ll get 15mpg, instead of the 6-8mpg they get now. Us North American’s will accept diesel vehicles in all the wrong ways as well. I must hand it to GM for making a hybrid vehicle that is somewhat useful. Still, a full size truck shouldn’t skimp in the payload and towing capacity department.

    GM should have built a 2500 series hybrid to make it more worthwhile, especially for us commercial guys who buy them more for purpose, than just to get groceries and booze. Another excellent article Jill, as always.

    And for the metric system, I don’t care how fuel is read. I’m familiar with imperial miles per gallon, US miles per gallon and L/100km. Just how I like my beer, I don’t care if it’s a quart, pint or bottle, as long as it’s cold and I can drink it, that’s all that matters.

    sinkingsun says:

    @360ci,
    Haven’t you heard? Diesel is a dirty word.

    Ican'tbelieveGM says:

    @Mozeby:
    15 real world MPG and MSRP of $60K for the Chevy?

    Get a regular gas F-150 or Tundra with real towing capacity and save $28K.


    GM man, you are an anti-GM idiot.


    Yeah…why pay $60K for a POS GM when you can buy a POS Ford or Tundra instead for $60K. The only difference is that in a few years Toyota will actually be able to build a truck that works…lol


    Let’s all buy 60K POS’ like idiot Vinagrette proposes, oh well.


    Mozeby you gonna cry?

    Maybe we should all buy a Ridgeline…now there’s a truck….lol…(unless you are carrying a load in the bed and get a flat tire…then you have to unload the POS and to get to the spare…Another great design from Jap…lol)! But we all know that’s not a real truck, who would carry a load of anything in that load of S$#@…just like a Tundra not a real world truck. You see bonehead Diesel is the way to go!

    sinkingsun says:

    @ Balsac: It is true, you have none.

    Listen to balsac less, go out an buy a Honda or Toyota. Of course, he hasn’t heard, “diesel is a dirty word.”


    @No balsac:
    I supposed it’s better to soil your, hands, shirt sleeves, and pants as you crank and lower the spare tire from under the truck bed, that area between the rear bumper and rear axle that always remains grime free. And of course, you will always get a flat tire on a clean paved road when you have to lay flat on your back to disengage the cable from the spare rim. Of course, melting snow slush is always clean and never muddy.

    See, that’s how stupid No balsac postings are, mind you, I am disagreeing with your idiotic views, not you personally, oh well.

    IcantbelieveGM says:

    Real world 15 MPG for the GM hybrid is the same as the regular gas engine. What’s the point?

    Features include
        Green Scene
    Green Car Reviews
    Green Car Buyer's Guide
    Eco News
    Fuel Economy Challenge
    Hybrids
    Green Features
    Green Future
    Technology
    Untitled
    Quick Links
    Research: Buyer's Guide, Price Guide, First Drives, Test Drives, Luxury Cars, Trucks, Used Vehicles
    Photos: Galleries - Ten thousand BIG photos
    Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS: Daily updates
    Untitled
    © 1999-2009, CanadianDriver Communications Inc., all rights reserved
    Disclaimer | Privacy | Advertise