Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise |
|
| Canada's Online Auto Magazine |
|
|
![]() |
![]() February 14, 2008
Used Vehicle Review:
Discuss this story in the forum at CarTalkCanada
Photo Gallery: The Ford F-150 is one of the most recognizable automotive nameplates around. No surprise when you consider that the F-Series has consistently been one of the best-selling vehicles in Canada for a long time. In the past, strong sales meant that Ford didn't need to update the F-Series very often, but an increasingly competitive truck segment has forced Ford to keep its meat-and-potatoes model more up to date. The F-Series remained pretty much the same from 1980 to 1997, but what was brand new in 1997 was replaced in 2004, and that model is now set to be replaced by an all-new F-series for 2009.
Looking at fuel consumption specs, I'd advise skipping the smaller V8. Its rather meager power advantage over the V6 doesn't seem to outweigh its extra fuel consumption. Certainly, the 5.4-litre motor uses more gas than either of the smaller ones, but it is the best engine for heavy towing. The V6 would probably be adequate for occasional hauling and light towing. Granted, a spark plug problem (see below) might make the smaller V8 preferable in order to avoid future maintenance headaches.
Half-ton F-150 trucks have a decent reputation as far as long-term durability, but there are a few things to watch for. One common issue in 2004-2006 trucks with the 5.4-litre three-valve V8 is spark plugs that break off in the cylinder head when it comes time to replace the plugs. This has the potential to turn what should be a simple, routine maintenance item into an expensive problem. Worst case scenario is that the cylinder head(s) have to be removed in order to remove the broken plug(s). See (http://www.fordf150.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=290238#290238) Ford issued a Technical Service Bulletin to reduce the chances of this happening,
Consumer Reports notes serious drivetrain issues for 2004 through 2007 V8 trucks with four-wheel drive, but I couldn't find any specific information when searching various Ford truck forums. Crash safety appears to be good. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) gave the 2004 F-150 five stars for driver and front passenger protection in a frontal impact. Also, both two- and four-wheel drive models got four star rollover ratings. Same deal from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS); the F-150 earned that organization's "good" rating in frontal offset crash testing. Neither organization conducted side impact testing.
My research suggests that the F-series has an advantage over its domestic competitors in terms of reliability. Truck buyers' decisions tend to be coloured by brand loyalty though, so anything I say here is going to do little to convince Dodge and GM "guys" to switch teams. However, for the first-time truck buyer with little or no allegiance to one company over the others, I'd suggest the F-150 as a solid choice for a used truck.
Pricing
Red Book Pricing (avg. retail) February 2008:
Related articles on CanadianDriver
First Drives
Test Drives
Day-by-Day Reviews
Online resources
It's tough to find an F-150 forum that's not busy, thanks to these trucks' popularity. A few of the better ones, though, include Ford-Trucks.com; FordF150.net and F150Online.com.
Manufacturer's web site
Recalls
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2004317; Units affected: 16
2004: Certain vehicles may have a fuel tank with a depression at the seam between top and bottom halves of the tank (not visible from outside the fuel tank). If a depression is large enough, fuel may permeate the fuel tank wall resulting in a fuel odour, illumination of the "Service Engine Soon" indicator light, or a fuel leak. A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source could result in a fire. Correction: Dealers will replace the fuel tank.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2004141; Units affected: 20
2004: On certain vehicles, localized depressions in the fuel tank wall at the seam between the top and bottom halves of the tank may allow fuel to permeate resulting in a fuel odour, and/or a Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) illumination. Correction: Dealer will replace the fuel tank.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2006032; Units affected: 17,390
2005-2006: Certain vehicles were built with a software error in the instrument cluster. This error could prevent the Antilock Brake System (ABS) warning light from illuminating if the ABS module ever became inoperative. Correction: Dealers will recalibrate the instrument cluster.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2005356; Units affected: 13,581
2006: On certain vehicles, the windshield wiper motor may have been produced without grease applied to the output shaft gear. After a period of continuous use on the high-speed setting, lack of grease may cause the gear teeth to distort and/or fracture during operation, resulting in the loss of wiper function. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if required, apply grease to the output shaft gear.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2007241; Units affected: 4
2007: On certain vehicles, the fuel tank may contain localized depressions in the tank wall at the seam between the top and bottom halves of the tank. If the depression is large enough, fuel may permeate the fuel tank wall resulting in a fuel odour, Malfunction Indicator Lamp (MIL) illumination or a fuel leak. A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire. Correction: Dealers will replace the fuel tank.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2004167; Units affected: 208
2004: Certain F250/350 King Ranch and Lariat 4x4 single rear wheel vehicles equipped with Goodyear Wrangler AT/S LT275/65R18 tires fail to conform to the requirements of CMVSS 120. One or more of the tires installed may have an incorrect load range rating for the vehicle, which can result in a tire being overloaded. If a tire is operated in an over-loaded or over-inflated condition, the tire may rupture without warning resulting in a rapid air loss, which could increase the risk of a crash. Correction: Dealer will replace the load range "C" tires with load range "E" tires.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2005182; Units affected: 5,528
2005: On certain pick-up trucks and chassis cab vehicles equipped with 5.4L and 6.8L gasoline engines, a fuel jumper line may separate from the connection to the main fuel bundle. If the fuel line separates, an operator may notice a gasoline odour and/or fuel on the ground, loss of power, and eventual engine stall. A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source could result in a fire. Correction: Dealers will install an external retention clip at the fuel jumper line to main fuel bundle connection.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2007099; Units affected: 4,307
2008: On certain trucks equipped with 6.4L diesel engines, excessive temperatures in the diesel particulate filter may cause a visible flame out the tailpipe. Excessively hot exhaust or flames emitting from the tailpipe, in the presence of combustible material, may result in a fire, or may result in personal injury if a person is in close proximity to the tailpipe. Correction: Dealers will reprogram the powertrain control module.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2007100; Units affected: 52
2008: On certain trucks equipped with 6.4L diesel engines, insufficient clearance between the positive battery cable and the right hand splash shield bolt may result in wire chaffing damage and the risk of an electrical short. If this occurs, possible heat or fire damage to the cable and/or other components, either under-hood or near other possible ground points on the vehicle, may occur. Correction: Dealers will inspect and, if necessary, reposition the positive battery cable.
Transport Canada Recall Number: 2005183; Units affected: 16,601
2004: On certain vehicles equipped with a 6.0L diesel engine, the Fuel Injection Control Module (FICM) wire harness may chafe against an engine bolt. Also, the Injection Control Pressure (ICP) sensor connector terminals may have an improper crimp height that may result in intermittent or permanent loss of the ICP sensor signal. FICM wire harness chafes or improper ICP sensor connector crimps may cause the vehicle to stall without warning while driving. If the vehicle stalls, it may or may not restart. Correction: For all F-Superduty and Excursion vehicles, dealers will inspect the FICM wire harness for chafing. If bare wires have not been exposed, dealers will install a wire protection kit. If bare wires have been exposed, dealers will install a new wire harness. For all E-Series and, depending on build date, some F-Superduty and Excursion vehicles, dealers will install a new ICP sensor connector with certified crimps.
Used vehicle prices vary depending on factors such as general condition, odometer reading, usage history and options fitted. Always have a used vehicle checked by an experienced auto technician before you buy.
For information on recalls, see Transport Canada's web-site, www.tc.gc.ca, or the U.S. National Highway Transportation Administration (NHTSA)web-site, www.nhtsa.dot.gov.
For information on vehicle service bulletins issued by the manufacturer, visit www.nhtsa.dot.gov.
For information on consumer complaints about specific models, see www.lemonaidcars.com.
Chris Chase is an Ottawa-based automotive journalist.
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CanadianDriver is a member of the AOL Canada Media Network. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||