Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise |
|
| Canada's Online Auto Magazine |
|
![]() |
![]() October 10, 2007 Test Drive: 2008 Subaru WRX hatchback
Discuss this story in the forum at CarTalkCanada Find this vehicle in CanadianDriver’s Classified AdsPhoto Gallery: 2008 Subaru WRX Ottawa, Ontario - The first-generation Subaru WRX was an easy car to make excuses for. If someone told you your WRX was no good because it was small/funny-looking/unrefined, you could simply counter by saying none of that stuff mattered because the WRX was so quick.
The end result of the 2008 redesign is a car that behaves a lot like its older sibling, the Legacy GT. Where the old WRX was a little rough around the edges, this new one is far slicker in how it operates. The familiar thrum of the horizontally-opposed engine is there, but noise from under the hood is more muted and only becomes apparent in hard acceleration. Road noise is also much-reduced compared to the old WRX.
A little disappointing was the feel of the manual shifter in my test car, which was ropy and unsatisfying to use. It feels like Subaru was trying to emulate a BMW shifter: the long lever and longish throws feel about right, but the Subie shifter lacks the precise, positive action of the Bimmer 'boxes. The clutch, however, is buttery smooth and easy to modulate for smooth launches. Like acceleration, braking is strong and the brakes are also easy to modulate, but the pedal is soft, which takes away from the sporty feel that a car like the WRX should have. Subaru should have talked to the engineers who put together the Pontiac Solstice GXP I drove the week previous to the WRX. Drive the Subaru long enough and you'll get used to the soft brakes, but my main problem with the mushy pedal was that it makes heel-and-toe downshifts difficult.
Speaking of camping, that's when the WRX's mix of performance and practicality - something it's always possessed - impressed me. Lots of room in the car for our gear, and also for us: without the optional sunroof, there's loads of headroom up front, and even rear seat passengers get treated pretty well, too. The interior felt roomier, too, than that of the larger Legacy, with what seemed like similar rear seat legroom and better space in the front seats. Certainly, there's more people space here than in the old Impreza. Cargo-wise, my only beef is with the rather high cargo floor, necessitated by the driveline components that live under there, just behind the rear seat. While cargo space is adequate, there's a lot more room in the back of a Mazda3 Sport. I cannot, however, complain about how the rear seats fold perfectly flat to create an impressive-looking amount of cargo space for large loads.
The old WRX looked better (at least in my opinion) and many might bemoan the loss of that car's spunkier demeanor. But progress in the auto business means that new models have to be an improvement over their predecessors, and the new WRX certainly succeeds in this regard. Couple that with a lower price tag - the 2008 WRX hatch's $33,895 MSRP is $1,700 cheaper than its 2007 counterpart's - and this car asks the question: why make excuses for the car, when you can just make the car better?
Pricing
Specifications
Competitors
Related articles on CanadianDriver
Crash test results
Manufacturer's web site
Chris Chase is an Ottawa-based automotive journalist.
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
CanadianDriver is a member of the AOL Canada Media Network. | |||||||||||||||