Search | Site Map | Newsletter | RSS | About CD | Contact Us | Advertise |
|
| Canada's Online Auto Magazine |
|
![]() |
![]() April 4, 2007 Test Drive: 2007 BMW X5 3.0si
Discuss this story in the forum at CarTalkCanada Second opinion by Greg Wilson When a lone voice dissents in the wilderness, is she right? I have to admit, while I try to be humble in other areas, there's a certain amount of arrogance that naturally goes with this job: to pass judgment on a vehicle, you have to believe you're right about it. And that presents a problem with the redesigned 2007 BMW X5. While I found several attributes in its favour, the package as a whole didn't impress me all that much. That's at odds with most of my colleagues, who have written mostly praise for the German automaker's South Carolina-built SUV, and which leads me to wonder why the X5 doesn't push my buttons the way it does theirs.
Two engines are available: the X5 4.8i uses a 4.8-litre V8, while my 3.0si tester carries a 3.0-litre inline six. Both engines use a six-speed automatic transmission and xDrive, the company's superb proactive all-wheel drive system; under normal driving conditions, it distributes torque 40/60 front to rear, but can transfer up to 100 per cent of power when required, using sensors to determine the possibility of wheel slippage.
I wasn't overly impressed with the process of actually getting the X5 on the road. My tester had been equipped with aluminum running boards (part of a $1,300 "Activity Package" that also includes a ski bag, storage compartment package and headlight washers); as with many SUVs from various manufacturers, they proved too narrow to be good steps, but wide enough that they were a royal pain when getting in and out.
My third gripe is with the gearshift lever, which is basically the 7 Series' column-mounted switch moved to the centre console.
As befitting a BMW, the X5's fit and finish is pretty much beyond reproach, with a handsome dash layout, good driver's seating position, and firm seats that provide exceptional support for long-distance driving. My tester's Premium Package included "comfort" seats, which include power cushion length and lumbar support.
The rear seats are big and comfortable, with a full-length padded armrest and cargo pass-through. Third-row seats are a $1,900 option and judging by the space back there, I would imagine they'd be just as uncomfortable as those from most other manufacturers; unless you absolutely must haul a minivan's worth of people without buying a minivan, go for the five-passenger version, which includes a huge divided storage compartment hidden under the rear cargo floor.
On the asphalt, I found the X5 tries too hard to put the "Sport" into SUV: the ride is very harsh, sending every road bump into the cabin. The steering is exceptionally responsive - this is a BMW, after all - but there's only so much you can do when faced with physics, and no matter what, a 2,260-kg truck with a high centre of gravity can only be so adept through the twisties. I would definitely check off the Active Steering option ($4,700, which combines it with adaptive drive), as I found the X5's steering to be very stiff at lower speeds, and it could benefit from that system's lighter effort in parking lots.
Which leads me back to my original question: is there something really special about the X5, which is plain as day to my colleagues, and for some reason is evading me? I wanted to love the X5; BMW is, admittedly, one of my favourite automakers, and I'm very fond of most of its products. I tried to be objective, and I did find many high points, but I found even more that turned me away from it. Of course, in the long run, only a test-drive and your own opinion will decide if it's the right or wrong vehicle for you. Second Opinion: Greg Wilson You're not alone Jil. I have to agree on most points: the 2007 X5 3.0si does feel heavy and ponderous on the road, particularly around town. The ride is stiff and the steering effort at slower speeds is firm. The step-in height is rather high and the optional aluminum running board actually makes it more difficult to get into the cabin.
The new X5 seems to have lost some of its nimbleness - not surprising since it is bigger. In a way I regret having criticized the last X5 for having a small trunk - as did many other writers. Now BMW has made it bigger and heavier, so it's lost some of its sportiness. Regarding the X5's complicated controls and difficult ingress/egress, I wonder if BMW designers drive and use the products they design? Anyone who drove this X5 for a few days would see the problems.
Pricing: 2007 BMW X5 3.0si
Specifications
Related stories on CanadianDriver
Competitors
Crash test results
Manufacturer's web site
Jil McIntosh's automotive work and her garage includes cars both old and new; she writes for The Toronto Star Wheels, Old Autos, and Canadian Street Rodder.
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
CanadianDriver is a member of the AOL Canada Media Network. | |||||||||||||||||