November 21, 2009, 07:06:35 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Day-by-Day Review: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8GT; Day 3
So the Genesis Coupe isn't the most practical sports car around, says James, but what really matters here is how the car drives. And it's in that department that this car really shines, he says.

News: Test Drive: 2010 Mazda3 GS sedan w/five-speed automatic
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2008 Mazda B4000 SE pickup  (Read 2552 times)
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1182

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: January 22, 2008, 10:16:52 pm »



Test Drive:
2008 Mazda B4000 SE pickup

2008 Mazda B4000 SE pickupAvailable only in an extended-cab bodystyle, the V6-powered B4000 pickup truck has the highest towing capability of all the B-Series trucks, but its rear flip-down seats "are not really viable adult seating positions", reports contributor Bob McHugh.

 More:
Read the article | View the photos | All The Test Drives
Logged
airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 10669



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2008, 05:58:13 am »

a 5.3l 4x4 GMC gets better mileage
the B4000 4X4 offers 15.4 L/100 km (18 m.p.g.) city and 11.6 L/100 km (24 m.p.g.) (highway)
5.3l 4WD:                 15.1                                              10.6

So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Logged
Cord
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2803


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2008, 01:13:13 pm »

Quote
So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Purchase price?
Logged

Confidence is food for the wise man and liquor for the fool.
quadzilla
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 GTi
Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5058



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2008, 01:21:06 pm »

Quote
So why would I want a smaller 4x4 truck again

Purchase price?

Not everybody wants a full size truck?
Logged

I'd rather see the whole picture on part of the screen than part of the picture on the whole screen.
mrthompson
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2000 Ford Focus SE
Gender: Male
Location: County of Northumberland
Posts: 6151

Resident Dingus


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2008, 01:40:30 pm »

Why hasn't FoMoCo updated this beast?  10 years without a significant update.  And no 4 door model available.  My BIL recently purchased his 3rd Ranger in a row.  I question why he would buy another one when there are better/improved competitors?  Oh well...it's not my money.
Logged
Cord
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2803


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2008, 02:56:38 pm »

The last few months have produced the largest monthly sales on record for the Ranger in Canada. It's probably a little difficult for Ford of Canada to claim they need a new model to be competitive. Hopefully though we will see an update sooner than later. Those so-called rear seats just get in the way of storage space.
Logged

Confidence is food for the wise man and liquor for the fool.
PJungnitsch
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1987 Mazda B2000
Gender: Male
Location: Medicine Hat, AB
Posts: 2080



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2008, 03:17:40 pm »

Why hasn't FoMoCo updated this beast?  10 years without a significant update.  And no 4 door model available.  My BIL recently purchased his 3rd Ranger in a row.  I question why he would buy another one when there are better/improved competitors?  Oh well...it's not my money.

Same reason my Dad bought one I imagine, they are half price, and still get the job done:

Base Ranger 4X4 extended cab auto: $23,120 @ 0% for 60 is $385/month.

Base Tacoma 4X4 extended cab auto: $32,975 @ 4.9% for 60 is $621/month.

And that's without any dickering, which the Ford or Mazda dealer is much more likely to do.

It's a shame Ford doesn't put in that new 4 cyl/6 speed auto in all models, they do go for a mileage special but only with the older 4cyl and only in the regular cab.

Adding contemporary safety features like SAB and ESP would be good as well as some modern optimizations for better mileage. That 'you get almost the same mileage in a full size truck' issue always comes up.

If they could do those improvements while keeping the cost the same (and they should, small cars have been upping safety and mileage while holding price) they could do well IMO.

I'd love to replace my B2000 with a similar but modern small and efficient truck, but one doesn't exist.
Logged
mrthompson
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2000 Ford Focus SE
Gender: Male
Location: County of Northumberland
Posts: 6151

Resident Dingus


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2008, 03:39:30 pm »

The BIL bought an FX4 model.  He previously owned a '90 reg. cab short box 4x4 that he beat the living pi$$ out of (farmer/hunter/angler).  It caught fire about 4 years ago.  It was replaced by a leased 2WD ext. cab.  When the lease expired, he purchased the new FX4.

I will agree that the current Ranger/B series is a 'right size' truck for many people.  The competition has grown noticibly, and some people don't want a mid-size truck.
Logged
jcon
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Something New, 2006 Honda Accord EX-L
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1555



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2008, 04:14:04 pm »

My buddy has '96 Ranger and loves it. He plans to replace it soon with another. Of course he's convinced that they've completely redesigned the model since he purchased his because, and I quote, "They look taller now." Tongue

It's a great little truck. I considered it and would still consider it, if I wasn't planing on having children in the near future.  Cheesy

I think I would get the Ranger over the B4000, but the best deal would win.

These vehicles sell quite well, and Ford/Mazda are not taking any chances with a complete redesign.
Logged
PJungnitsch
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 1987 Mazda B2000
Gender: Male
Location: Medicine Hat, AB
Posts: 2080



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2008, 04:34:01 pm »

These vehicles sell quite well, and Ford/Mazda are not taking any chances with a complete redesign.

That's because they are closing the factory in Minnesota. Shutdown been postponed a little because of the very strong Canadian sales mentioned, but American sales are awful. AFAIK there still is no certain word on what happens next, but it may be dropped altogether.

The future of the Ford Ranger pickup is uncertain. What is certain is that the only plant assembling the Ranger, in St. Paul, Minn., is scheduled to be closed in 2008.

Options include dropping the compact pickup line, moving Ranger production to another plant or redesigning the pickup using portions of the Explorer architecture. If Ford executives endorse the last choice, the redesigned pickup could be on the market at the end of this decade or the beginning of the next. If redesigned, "F-100" has been considered as the new name.

Ford also has studied a global compact pickup design that could be built overseas and exported to several markets, including the United States.

Plans to redesign the Ranger have been delayed several times. The current pickup dates back to the 1993 model year.
Logged
Greg B.
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 483


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2008, 05:44:01 pm »

Last year both my brother and a good friend leased new Ranger V-6 Sport extended cabs at ridiculously low prices -- something on the order of $340/month. They both love them. This is my brother's second Ranger. I have to admit, they have a unique market niche -- there aren't a whole lot of pickups out there this size any more; most are far too big. And with the tooling costs long having since been amortized, Ford can afford to sell these competitively, though maybe not this competitively. I read recently that when Alan Mulally took over at Ford he was told that Ford loses thousands on each Ranger they sell. So its future is dark.
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda Millenia Millenium S 2000 MMMMedition; 1997 Ford Ranger
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 35210



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2008, 05:58:49 pm »

OK i Owe each of U Guys a cheap Tequilla Or a 1,000 Pak of LAKEPORT ya can call me Ranger Bill ya can calls me Mazda 3000 but ya doesn't have ta CALL ME JOHNSTON....... Wink Grin


* Safs PeeCup.JPG (80.33 KB, 800x533 - viewed 107 times.)

* organ.gif (28.96 KB, 231x200 - viewed 536 times.)
« Last Edit: January 28, 2008, 12:37:07 pm by safristi » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Don't miss these great features

Photo Galleries
1000s of photos, with full screen enlargements, all 2006 - Today models

Focus on Trucks
We've brought all our truck reviews and photos together in one place. Easy.

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC      Disclaimer        Privacy Advertise
© 2005 - 2009 CarTalkCanada & 1999 - 2009 CanadianDriver Communications Inc, all rights reserved.
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 33 queries.