November 08, 2009, 09:25:12 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Day-by-Day Review: 2009 Nissan cube; Day 3
"I really want to like the cube," says James, but unfortunately, he keeps discovering more shortcomings to this car's quirky design.

News: What’s New: 2010 Honda Odyssey
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: 2008 Ford F-150 Super Crew 4x4  (Read 2620 times)
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1180

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: April 29, 2008, 11:41:35 pm »



Test Drive:
2008 Ford F-150 Super Crew 4x4

2008 Ford F-150 Super Crew 4x4 The Ford F-150 will be all-new for 2009, but the 2008 truck still offers a roomy interior and strong engine, says Assistant Editor Jil McIntosh - although you may not like its thirst for fuel.  

 More:
Read the article | View the photos | All The Test Drives
Logged
Leviathan
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Tribute 4WD 2.3L 5 speed.
Gender: Male
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2209


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2008, 01:05:18 pm »

Quote
the best I could do was 19.6 L/100 km
Shocked  ROFL
Logged

George Stroumboulopoulos: Who's your favorite monster?
Colin Mochrie: Dick Cheney.
Cord
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2803


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2008, 08:56:22 pm »

Wow. Talk about a fish out of water for CTC. What are there, 4 or 5 members that have ever driven a full size truck? Wink
Logged

Confidence is food for the wise man and liquor for the fool.
Demosthenes X
Car Crazy
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Gender: Male
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 6133


the mighty duck


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2008, 10:11:17 pm »

ROFL  I was thinking the same thing.

Quote
the best I could do was 19.6 L/100 km
Shocked  ROFL

Roll Eyes  It's a full-size truck, get over it.  I dropped by the Honda dealer today with my dad, who's interested in the Ridgeline.  Even it gets pretty abysmal mileage - not much better than the V8 in the truck we've got now.  Civic Hybrid claims 66 MPG on the highway, though.  Wink
Logged

Demosthenes [noun], dem-aws-thene-s
1) (384 BC – 322 BC) the greatest of the Ancient Greek orators
2) pseudonym used by Valentine Wiggin in Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game to alter the events of world history
wing
Big Wig
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: '01 S2000 & '05 Titan SE
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 14642



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2008, 10:26:32 pm »

Difference is ridgeline makes it's advertised numbers, most others do not.  I drove the silverado Chris will be reviewing shortly.  I went 30km it cost me $7 in fuel with the 4 cyl shutdown mode.  Brutal!
Logged


articsteve
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Location: ON
Posts: 11543



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2008, 11:27:09 pm »

The Tundra 4x4 Double Cab with the 5.7, aggresive driving (lots of 2 lane highway passing), nets about 23l/100km or 12 mpg US so says the trip computer.
Logged

“Frankly, we are not going to ever defeat the insurgency,”
dorin
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Mazda3 GS
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4886


light makes right


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2008, 12:53:31 am »

Anyone who drives something that thirsty has no right to complain about the price of gas.  20+L/100km is insane!
Logged

My favourite MTB site in Ottawa: http://www.mtbkanata.com
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Subaru WRX Wagon - 2008 Subaru Tribeca Limited
Gender: Male
Location: South West Rim Impact Crater
Posts: 19308



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2008, 12:54:04 pm »

 Roll Eyes Was the truck even taken off the asphalt? Send one up to Truck Country next time and let some truck people test it.
Logged

initial_D
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Deer Red Green Lodge, Ab
Posts: 11000



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2008, 12:59:50 pm »

What I don't understand is why trucks these days have to be so big. It's a long step up into the cab, and thankfully, my tester's optional side steps were wide enough to be useful as a ladder up into it. The truck's height and width, along with its massive hood, made it a real handful any time I got off my rural roads and had to deal with city traffic or, even worse, city parking lots.

There are smaller trucks ... and also city folks don't know how to handle a truck should stick to cars.

Funny reading truck reviews done by car people.
Logged
Zoo
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2001 Civic Sedan, 1969 Chevelle, 2007 Yaris Hatchback
Gender: Male
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Posts: 919


Always hungry..


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2008, 01:50:11 pm »

"why you now must climb into and slide out of a truck, instead of simply getting into it. "

Hello! It's a 4X4! If she had of tested a 4X2 variant I doubt the step up into the cab would have been as onerous.

With the price of gas going where it is going I can't imagine driving a pickup truck as a daily driver. If you actually need the towing capacity or you actually load up the bed then fine. I will stick to more fuel efficient modes of transportation as I would rather spend my money on trips and other fun things then give my extra $ to the gas stations.

Now I look at people driving trucks and think they must be rich! Grin You've got to have some bucks to keep these puppies all fueled up! Heck, I found the gas bills pretty pricey when I was driving around an Astro with the 4.3 V6. This is a smaller engine than these trucks and this was in the day of 60-80 cents per litre. Tongue
Logged
Cord
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2803


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2008, 02:09:12 pm »

That brings up an interesting point that has long bugged me about car reviewers. That is, why do they think it necessary to comment on things that can be chalked up to merely not being used to them? Almost never drive a truck and then complain that you can't park it? I can assure the author of this review that there are many, many truck owners that are able to park their trucks just fine and that also find the large size very useful.

I am reminded of this point almost every day when I drive unfamiliar vehicles. For instance I drove an '07 BMW 323i the other day and I just about went nuts trying to operate the signal lights. The lever required such light pressure that every time I went to cancel a signal I ended up signaling the other way. I just wasn't used to it. Of course, in a short time I had adapted and what initially was an infuriating design soon wasn't even noticed anymore.

The shifter doesn't feel right. I don't like the feel of the switchgear. The windows are too small. The load height is too high. The engine is too buzzy. Blah, blah, blah. Then owners of these cars wonder what the hell the reviewer is talking about because these things have become meaningless after a few days of living with the vehicle.

IMO, it seems that too many reviews (not just CDs) these days are filled with these kinds of inconsequential criticisms.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2008, 02:11:26 pm by Cord » Logged

Confidence is food for the wise man and liquor for the fool.
Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Subaru Outback, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 3412


You'll have to forgive him. He's from Barcelona.


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2008, 02:49:26 pm »

You have to admit though, that all 4X4s have gotten a lot taller over the years. I had a 1986 F-150 4X4 truck for work. I could easily slide into the seat without using the grab handles. I don't even come close to doing that now. The (opened) tailgate used to be about hip or belt level. Now its almost chest high depending on the suspension package. Can pretty much forget about loading stuff over the side.

Still miss the old boxy Fords.


* 1995 F150.jpg (17.75 KB, 350x244 - viewed 128 times.)
« Last Edit: May 01, 2008, 04:42:24 pm by Big_Thumb » Logged

Support for climate change theory comes from scientific journals, opposition from editorials.

Oh, give me land, lots of land under starry skies above,
Don't fence me in.
mrthompson
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2000 Ford Focus SE
Gender: Male
Location: County of Northumberland
Posts: 6129

Resident Dingus


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2008, 03:03:55 pm »

Overall height has increased, but ground clearance at the axles hasn't increased appreciably (special offroad models excluded).
Logged
Sir Osis of Liver
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Subaru Outback, 2006 Yamaha FZ6
Gender: Male
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 3412


You'll have to forgive him. He's from Barcelona.


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #13 on: May 01, 2008, 03:06:33 pm »

That's what I don't understand. Huh I'm not saying any of them are bad, but they have lost something in the utility department.
Logged

Support for climate change theory comes from scientific journals, opposition from editorials.

Oh, give me land, lots of land under starry skies above,
Don't fence me in.
johngenx
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Toyota Corolla 2001 Subaru Forester 2000 Suzuki Hayabusa "naked bike" - pending
Gender: Male
Location: A space inside my own head where there are only mountains and climbing days...
Posts: 7011



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2008, 04:17:22 pm »

I too can't believe the size of trucks now.  We had a full sized 1980 Dodge and it is smaller than the midsized trucks of today.  Why?  90% of these things operate at <25% of their capacity.
Logged

No place I'd rather be...
Wolfe
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda Miata
Gender: Male
Location: Tronno
Posts: 2812


BOO!


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2008, 06:33:09 pm »

Send one up to Truck Country next time and let some truck people test it.

I Agree The article was heavy on the comparative specs, and light on the... um truck review.
 

IMO, it seems that too many reviews (not just CDs) these days are filled with these kinds of inconsequential criticisms.


I Agree and notice how no one calls out carp cars at all. At least not until the next generation comes out and they tell you all the faults of the old one and how much better the new one is.

While I think CD's reviews are usually better than average in this regard, it's just not possible for every car to be average or better than average.
Logged

To err is human, to blame it on someone else is even more human.
mmret
Car Crazy
*****
Online Online

Vehicle: 06 Acura TSX
Gender: Male
Location: Not Hamilton
Posts: 4470



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #16 on: May 01, 2008, 06:49:55 pm »


While I think CD's reviews are usually better than average in this regard, it's just not possible for every car to be average or better than average.

There's always TTAC Wink
Logged

Two idiots > one wise man.
Snowman
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2006 Subaru WRX Wagon - 2008 Subaru Tribeca Limited
Gender: Male
Location: South West Rim Impact Crater
Posts: 19308



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #17 on: May 01, 2008, 09:05:57 pm »

Just once….just once I would like a CTC reviewer attempt to load something in the box and secure it with straps to see how user-friendly the process is.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Don't miss these great features

Photo Galleries
1000s of photos, with full screen enlargements, all 2006 - Today models

Focus on Trucks
We've brought all our truck reviews and photos together in one place. Easy.

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC      Disclaimer        Privacy Advertise
© 2005 - 2009 CarTalkCanada & 1999 - 2009 CanadianDriver Communications Inc, all rights reserved.
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 39 queries.