November 21, 2009, 02:03:51 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Day-by-Day Review: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8GT; Day 3
So the Genesis Coupe isn't the most practical sports car around, says James, but what really matters here is how the car drives. And it's in that department that this car really shines, he says.

News: Honda announces new Accord Crosstour pricing
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CTC Review: 2008 Nissan Rogue SL AWD  (Read 6878 times)
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1182

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: September 30, 2008, 08:13:34 pm »

Day 1:

2008 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Click Image to Enlarge
It is no GT-R, but more of a mainstream Nissan vehicle for me this week. Now, I am behind the wheel of the Nissan Rogue. My tester is an SL AWD model with the premium package.  This cute-ute was released as a new model late 2007 as a 2008 model, replacing the X-Trail in Canada as Nissan's smallest SUV.  More ...
Logged
airbalancer
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: Cobourg Ontario
Posts: 10667



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2008, 09:31:44 pm »

I sat in driver seat for minute and that was enough for me
It just did not fit me
Logged
sailor723
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 07 Cadillac SRX 09 Cooper S Cabrio
Gender: Male
Location: NB
Posts: 1635


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2008, 09:44:14 pm »

I opened the hatch for a minute and looked at the cargo area...that was enough for me.

The X-trail was a more practical cute-ute
Logged
koni
Learner's permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: ON
Posts: 2


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2008, 11:41:06 pm »

This Rogue seems like a good crossover for an average family. However, it may feel too small for some. This vehicle is comparable in size with the CRV and RAV4. However, if lower fuel economy is what matters to you, Rogue SL 4X4 is capable of below 10L/100km. This is thanks, in part, by the CVT transmission. However, some might need to get used to its "less instantaneous" acceleration feel. The overall fit and finish is good. Again, the inside might feel too small for some.
Logged
Craig
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 06 Acura TSX navi (MT)
Gender: Male
Location: Scarborough, Ontario
Posts: 2155


View Profile
 Stats

Champion of
   
More>>
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2008, 09:04:27 am »

Nissan called when our X-Trail lease was coming due, trying to get us into a new Rogue.  I'd seen a Rogue while waiting for an oil change, and the cargo capacity was closer to the Versa than the X-Trail.

While I don't doubt the new Rogue drives better and is more comfortable than the outgoing X, this family just can't downsize that far, the XTerra is too much truck, and the Quest can't match any of them in winter conditions.

I believe Nissan goofed by not bringing the new generation X-Trail to Canada.  We often prefer function over form.  I suppose the Made in Japan X-Trail is too expensive to produce to be as profitable as the Made in Mexico Rogue.
Logged
carcrazy
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Location: GTA
Posts: 2077

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2008, 10:43:33 am »

I looked at the pictures for a minute and it was enough for me; I just can’t stand the design.
Then I read the specs and saw the CVT and cargo dimensions and I realized I didn’t lose anything because I didn't like the design.
However, it appears that the Rogue does at least two things very well - best fuel economy and best acceleration out of all non-turbo 4-cylinder CUVs.
Logged
sparky
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 576


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2008, 11:02:13 am »

I HATE the Rogue. Not that it's all that awful, but it's going to keep the much more useful and attractive X-Trail out of Canada. Maybe the Americans will prefer this squatty little thing. I won't, and when my X-Trail lease is up, I'll be looking elsewhere.
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda Millenia Millenium S 2000 MMMMedition; 1997 Ford Ranger
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 35202



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2008, 11:51:05 am »

Sparky why Not "BUY IT OUT" if'n it's so good?......on My Sunday perigrenations i happened into a Nissan dealership (CLOSED) the best time to BUY!!!!..............the ROGUE was a wee bit "rougeish" BUT the two X-Trails  (2004 models) on the resale lot were way bigger,but as has been said kinda "ELEMENT" al in design and interior...way more useful for an active/sportiv family and $10K cheaper USED.......The new Murano was $49K !!! WDF..they are $15K 3.5 years OLDE!!!...i imagine the Versa SL would be a better expenditure for most ROGUE wannabees...............
Logged
sparky
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 576


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2008, 12:21:14 pm »

Hey, Saffy,
The buyout number on my lease is not favourable, and my needs have changed. Even the roomy X-Trail is strained by my 2 1/2 dogs and mountains of cottage supplies. My wife just bought herself a minivan, and Lord help me, I like it.
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda Millenia Millenium S 2000 MMMMedition; 1997 Ford Ranger
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 35202



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2008, 12:27:05 pm »

..poor Spark resistant...........goin' ta the DOGS..... Dancy Banana Thumbs up...well yer better off without wifey.....how old is the miniman. Wink............. Poke
Logged
Blueprint
Learner's permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Sentra 2.0S 6-speed manual, 2003 Honda Odyssey EX
Location: Montreal
Posts: 188


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2008, 12:35:47 pm »

We almost bought an XTrail in '04, looking for a 2nd car for my family of 5.  We got a Mazda MPV instead, nice to drive but it aged like a '70s Honda (front doors replaced on warranty because of rust --- at 3.5 yrs of age !!).

Wifey loved the Xtrail, but doesn't like the Rogue.

MPV is gone to another owner, now replaced by a new Nissan : a Sentra 6-speed stick, whose 1400 mm rear bench is actually wider than the Rogue's, even tough both cars share the same Renault Megane platform.
Logged
Blueprint
Learner's permit
*
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Sentra 2.0S 6-speed manual, 2003 Honda Odyssey EX
Location: Montreal
Posts: 188


member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2008, 12:37:43 pm »

Sparky why Not "BUY IT OUT" if'n it's so good?......on My Sunday perigrenations i happened into a Nissan dealership (CLOSED) the best time to BUY!!!!..............the ROGUE was a wee bit "rougeish" BUT the two X-Trails  (2004 models) on the resale lot were way bigger,but as has been said kinda "ELEMENT" al in design and interior...way more useful for an active/sportiv family and $10K cheaper USED.......The new Murano was $49K !!! WDF..they are $15K 3.5 years OLDE!!!...i imagine the Versa SL would be a better expenditure for most ROGUE wannabees...............

A serious post by Saf !!  Shocked

Base Murano is 37k$-ish, and is pretty loaded.
Logged
Altima1
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Altima SL
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 976

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #12 on: October 01, 2008, 01:47:51 pm »

Nissan called when our X-Trail lease was coming due, trying to get us into a new Rogue.  I'd seen a Rogue while waiting for an oil change, and the cargo capacity was closer to the Versa than the X-Trail.

While I don't doubt the new Rogue drives better and is more comfortable than the outgoing X, this family just can't downsize that far, the XTerra is too much truck, and the Quest can't match any of them in winter conditions.

I believe Nissan goofed by not bringing the new generation X-Trail to Canada.  We often prefer function over form.  I suppose the Made in Japan X-Trail is too expensive to produce to be as profitable as the Made in Mexico Rogue.

Incorrect, the Rogue is made in Kyūshū Japan.
Logged

Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. - Dale Carnegie

Diversity is not about how we differ.  Diversity is about embracing one another's uniqueness.  -Ola Joseph
OBOLINE
Guest

« Reply #13 on: October 01, 2008, 02:55:35 pm »

Hello all,

I drive an 08 Rogue SL AWD fully loaded. Before that, we had an 05 X-trail LE also fully loaded. As much as I loved the X-Trail, the Rogue is a much better vehicule. Fit and finish, handling, fuel economy, nicer looking ( debatable ) ... We have two babies, meaning two car seats, two strollers.  and honestly the Rogue fits the bill. Never had any problems with the cargo capacity, it looks smaller than the X-Trail but you'll be surprised how much it can swallow. On the negative side; blind spot, harsher ride than X-Trail ( but better handling ). As for the CVT, I didn't like it at first, but trust you'll get uset to it, it's so smooth...

OBOLINE
Logged
safristi
Car Crazy
*****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda Millenia Millenium S 2000 MMMMedition; 1997 Ford Ranger
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem
Posts: 35202



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #14 on: October 01, 2008, 03:06:34 pm »

Hey BluePRINT    i have 20/20 it woz $49 Loaded...............the Murano that is ROFL
Logged
Philip
Guest

« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2008, 06:08:13 pm »

Incorrect, the Rogue is made in Kyūshū Japan.

The Xtrail was made in Kyūshū Japan as well.

In the UK they get the Qashqai which is sold as the Dualis in (Japan).  The new Xtrail is the next step up in size.  I'm not sure if they get the Xterra over there... it sure doesn't appear on the Nissn Japan or UK website.

For North America however, Nissan stetched the Qashqai, restyled the exterior, and came up with the Rogue.  The Rogue is much closer to the XTrail in size, perhaps why they decided not to import two similar competing vehicles.
Logged
Philip
Guest

« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2008, 06:09:54 pm »

BTW, I do own a Rogue.  SL FWD, no options.  I like it very much.
Logged
RPM
Guest

« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2008, 10:16:59 pm »

I miss the old X-Trail. Plus the Americans didn't get it down there, its always nice to have something JDM thats not available in the US market.
Logged
Calbrez
Learner's permit
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Location: GTA
Posts: 164


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2008, 12:02:56 am »

VERY generic looking...looks like everything else out there

Someone mentioned the X-Trail - they were right...a nicer CUV by far

The X-Trail should be re-released - it's still sold outside of NA and it's even nice than the old model
Logged
Philip
Guest

« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2008, 07:08:26 am »

I disagree the Rogue is 'generic'.  Perhaps the the 'baby Murano' look... and Muranos are fairly common now.  If anything, the new Murano got a similar taillight treatment so now they really are indistinguishable.

As for cargo space, although the rear hatch is more rounded you can still fit a fair bit of gear.  I do agree that Nissan sacrificed some utility for the sake of styling.  But I think they got many things right.  The 2nd gen 2.5L motor in the Rogue is far smoother than it used to be (I had an '03 Altima previously), and the CVT does work very well.

I use mine for work everyday and haul just about everything: tools, material, and my weekend play stuff... mountain bikes, canoe, trailer.  It's been great and is far more flexible/useful than my Altima ever was.

As for fuel economy, with a light foot it is very easy to achieve 8l/100km.  That is just a tick off what my '03 Altima got (same 2,5L motor, 5spd manual).  Drive agressively though, and the CVT will keep the rpms high and the fuel economy plummets quickly.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Don't miss these great features

Photo Galleries
1000s of photos, with full screen enlargements, all 2006 - Today models

Focus on Trucks
We've brought all our truck reviews and photos together in one place. Easy.

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC      Disclaimer        Privacy Advertise
© 2005 - 2009 CarTalkCanada & 1999 - 2009 CanadianDriver Communications Inc, all rights reserved.
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 34 queries.