November 21, 2009, 07:59:26 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Day-by-Day Review: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8GT; Day 3
So the Genesis Coupe isn't the most practical sports car around, says James, but what really matters here is how the car drives. And it's in that department that this car really shines, he says.

News: Daimler starts production of electric Smart
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CD Article: Pontiac Grand Am, 1999-2004  (Read 1699 times)
CD_Editor
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1182

member


View Profile
 Stats
« on: October 23, 2008, 12:53:35 am »

         
Used Vehicle Review:
Pontiac Grand Am, 1999-2004

Pontiac Grand Am, 1999-2004Given the Pontiac Grand Am's poor reliability record, Contributing Editor, Chris Chase doesn't recommend buying one.  There are other used cars with better reliability for about the same money, he says.
 
More:

Read the article | View the photos | All the Used Vehicles
Logged
Altima1
Auto Obsessed
***
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2008 Nissan Altima SL
Gender: Male
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 976

member


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2008, 05:48:04 am »

Only one word to describe this car  J U N K
Logged

Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. - Dale Carnegie

Diversity is not about how we differ.  Diversity is about embracing one another's uniqueness.  -Ola Joseph
alienc
Learner's permit
*
Offline Offline

Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 7


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2008, 09:10:41 am »

I had a 1995 V-6 model.

The worst car I ever owned, I had it for 2.5 years and spent about $3000 repairing it.  I still owed money on it when I got rid of it.

Problem areas:

Rotor/Pads 3 times
Strut mounts (they were rusted and they caused the steering to bind)
2 set of front struts
Steering Rack (likely caused by the above problem)
2 set of Spark Plugs and wires
2 Ignition coils
2 alternators
Intake Manifold Gasket (I only had to replace this once)
Several AC Components (Compressor, all lines & Condensor)

The transmission and motor worked well and it was plenty powerful.  Just the cost of maintenance wasn't worth keeping it.

The way they wedged the motor under the hood caused it to run constantly hot and the cooling fan never turned off.  I think this heavy engine is also what contribued to the constant Strut and Brake replacement.

I stick to 4-cylinder cars now, alot easier to work on and not as hard on brake and suspension components.  I do miss the effortless torque though.
Logged
Beetlejuice
Enthusiast
**
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2007 Salsa Red Volkswagen Beetle 2.5, 5-speed
Gender: Male
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 442


Fahrvergnügen


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2008, 09:20:31 am »

The '95 was a different animal from the '99.  I owned a '99 and ran it up to 242,000 km without too many issues.  Mind you, I couldn't wait to get rid of it to get into the Volkswagen. 
Logged

Matthew
Guest

« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2008, 10:39:15 am »

My best friend sold his 1997 Plymouth Neon for a 2004 Grand Am GT.  He said it was the worst mistake he ever made.  On the neon he spent about $600 in 8 years of ownership replacing an A/C compressor (common problem on 1st Gen Neons), but that was about it, until he got rid of it with 201,000km on the clock. The Grand Am with only 70,000 kms has needed a new intake gasket, valve job, and it has a detonation issue in cold weather startup.  It knocks so badly.  Sounds like steel toe shoes spinning in a laundry drier!

I owned a Oldsmobile Alero, an infinitely superior car in every way.  The Alero other than motor and tranny is completely different.  The front subframe on the Alero is hydroformed Aluminum and much stiffer, which gave the Alero a ride and handling edge over the Grand Am.  I miss that car a lot from time to time, but my 2002 Prius gets me 4.6L-5.5L/100km on a consistent basis, so on that front I am still a winner!  My 2002 Neon hovers around 6.6L which is phenomenal for a car with 170,000.  Alero typically got around 7-8L/100km while my buddies Grand Am usually hovers around 11-12L/100km so I am told.
Logged
FiestaTT
Learner's permit
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 138


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2008, 01:37:13 pm »

Alero typically got around 7-8L/100km while my buddies Grand Am usually hovers around 11-12L/100km so I am told.

Did the Grand Am have a fuel line leak?
Logged
Greg B.
Enthusiast
**
Online Online

Location: Dartmouth, NS
Posts: 483


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2008, 07:16:54 pm »

I owned a Oldsmobile Alero, an infinitely superior car in every way.  The Alero other than motor and tranny is completely different.  The front subframe on the Alero is hydroformed Aluminum and much stiffer, which gave the Alero a ride and handling edge over the Grand Am.  

Hate to tell you this but they are the same car, were built on the same assembly line, and are identical mechanically, structurally and chassis-wise. Only styling and trim differs.
Logged
Careener
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: Mazda 6 Wagon and Mazda 3
Gender: Male
Location: GTA
Posts: 1889



View Profile WWW
 Stats
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2008, 07:28:32 pm »

Your friend's Grand Am has piston slap..quite common on that engine.
Has your dash warped on your Alero? Also do you have an extra shifter knob? My coworkers fell off and he can't source a new one.
Logged
Winklovic
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2002 Chrysler Sebring LX, 17.86@77 mph
Gender: Male
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 1622



View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2008, 10:19:14 pm »

Those Grand Ams are also ridiculously easy to steal.
Logged

Enjoy every sandwich. - Warren Zevon
Honda Owner
Drunk on Fuel
****
Offline Offline

Vehicle: 2009 Honda Accord
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1230


View Profile
 Stats
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2008, 02:31:28 am »

The Grand Am is one of the worst cars ever built. It was typical of GM cars of the era, ie it was designed to look good but fall apart one km and one second after the warranty was up. What is really ironic is they were not cheap when they were new.

As for the other poster's views on the Alero, they are the same car. The part numbers for all the mechanical components are identical.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



Don't miss these great features

Photo Galleries
1000s of photos, with full screen enlargements, all 2006 - Today models

Focus on Trucks
We've brought all our truck reviews and photos together in one place. Easy.

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC      Disclaimer        Privacy Advertise
© 2005 - 2009 CarTalkCanada & 1999 - 2009 CanadianDriver Communications Inc, all rights reserved.
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 28 queries.